Cited by 19Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

Quantitative analysis of global protein stability rates in tissues

Open access
McClatchy, Daniel B., Martínez-Bartolomé, Salvador, Gao, Yu, Lavallée-Adam, Mathieu, Yates, John R.·2020·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein degradation is an essential mechanism for maintaining proteostasis in response to internal and external perturbations. Disruption of this process is implicated in many human diseases. We present a new technique, QUAD (Quantification of Azidohomoalanine Degradation), to analyze the global degradation rates in tissues using a non-canonical amino acid and mass spectrometry. QUAD analysis reveals that protein stability varied within tissues, but discernible trends in the data suggest that cellular environment is a major factor dictating stability. Within a tissue, different organelles and protein functions were enriched with different stability patterns. QUAD analysis demonstrated that protein stability is enhanced with age in the brain but not in the liver. Overall, QUAD allows the first global quantitation of protein stability rates in tissues, which will allow new insights and hypotheses in basic and translational research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-72410-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 81 · Cited by 19

Authors
McClatchy, D. B., Martínez-Bartolomé, S., Gao, Y., Lavallée-Adam, M., & Yates, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Yates, John R.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-09-29
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
15983-15983
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091497311
Cited by
19
References
81
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (P41 GM103533)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
protein stability, protein degradation, proteostasis, Quad, azidohomoalanine, brain aging, liver aging
MeSH terms
Proteostasis, Age Factors, Alanine, Animals, Brain, Liver, Male, Organ Specificity, Mass Spectrometry, Proteome, Mice, Protein Stability, Click Chemistry, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review