Cited by 61Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

The trans-kingdom battle between donor and recipient gut microbiome influences fecal microbiota transplantation outcome

Open access
Kazemian, Negin, Ramezankhani, Milad, Sehgal, Aarushi, Khalid, Faizan Muhammad, Kalkhoran, Amir Hossein Zeinali, Narayan, Apurva, Wong, Gane Ka-Shu, Kao, Dina +1 more·2020·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Fundamental restoration ecology and community ecology theories can help us better understand the underlying mechanisms of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and to better design future microbial therapeutics for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (rCDI) and other dysbiosis-related conditions. In this study, stool samples were collected from donors and rCDI patients one week prior to FMT (pre-FMT), as well as from patients one week following FMT (post-FMT). Using metagenomic sequencing and machine learning, our results suggested that FMT outcome is not only dependent on the ecological structure of the recipients, but also the interactions between the donor and recipient microbiomes at the taxonomical and functional levels. We observed that the presence of specific bacteria in donors (Clostridioides spp., Desulfovibrio spp., Odoribacter spp. and Oscillibacter spp.) and the absence of fungi (Yarrowia spp.) and bacteria (Wigglesworthia spp.) in recipients prior to FMT could predict FMT success. Our results also suggested a series of interlocked mechanisms for FMT success, including the repair of the disturbed gut ecosystem by transient colonization of nexus species followed by secondary succession of bile acid metabolizers, sporulators, and short chain fatty acid producers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-75162-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 61

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [38]Seekatz AM Restoration of short chain fatty acid and bile acid metabolism following fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection Anaerobe 2018 53 666 PMC6185828 29654837
  2. [46]Louppe, G., Wehenkel, L., Sutera, A. & Geurts, P. in Neural Information Processing Systems 2013. (eds C. J. C. Burges et al.).

Authors
Kazemian, N., Ramezankhani, M., Sehgal, A., Khalid, F. M., Kalkhoran, A. H. Z., Narayan, A., Wong, G. K.-S., Kao, D., & Pakpour, S.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • National Institute of Technology Hamirpur (BD)
  • BGI Group (China) (CN)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Kao, Dina
  • Pakpour, Sepideh
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-10-27
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
18349-18349
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097104812
Cited by
61
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
fecal microbiota transplantation, recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, gut microbiota, secondary succession, Wigglesworthia, Yarrowia, Oscillibacter, Desulfovibrio, Clostridioides, dysbiosis, microbial community ecology
MeSH terms
Eubacteriales, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Machine Learning, Clostridioides, Adult, Clostridium Infections, Desulfovibrio, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Tissue Donors, Treatment Outcome, Bacteroidetes, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review