Cited by 86Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsLiver physiology and pathologyDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Human extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids show region-specific differentiation potential and model cystic fibrosis-related bile duct disease

Open access
Verstegen, Monique M. A., Roos, Floris J. M., Burka, Ksenia, Gehart, Helmuth, Jager, Myrthe, de Wolf, Maaike, Bijvelds, Marcel J. C., de Jonge, Hugo R. +18 more·2020·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The development, homeostasis, and repair of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts are thought to involve distinct mechanisms including proliferation and maturation of cholangiocyte and progenitor cells. This study aimed to characterize human extrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids (ECO) using canonical Wnt-stimulated culture medium previously developed for intrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids (ICO). Paired ECO and ICO were derived from common bile duct and liver tissue, respectively. Characterization showed both organoid types were highly similar, though some differences in size and gene expression were observed. Both ECO and ICO have cholangiocyte fate differentiation capacity. However, unlike ICO, ECO lack the potential for differentiation towards a hepatocyte-like fate. Importantly, ECO derived from a cystic fibrosis patient showed no CFTR channel activity but normal chloride channel and MDR1 transporter activity. In conclusion, this study shows that ECO and ICO have distinct lineage fate and that ECO provide a competent model to study extrahepatic bile duct diseases like cystic fibrosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-79082-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Berkers and colleagues used forskolin to induce organoid swelling due to chloride and fluid flux into the lumen.

    “Berkers and colleagues used forskolin, a CFTR activator, to induce organoid swelling due to chloride and fluid flux into the lumen191.”

    From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [191]

    The Methods section (“Forskolin-induced swelling assay”) says that this paper’s authors added forskolin to activate CFTR and that anion secretion drove fluid into the organoid lumen, increasing its volume. The Results section reports swelling in both organoid types. The cited paper is by Verstegen and colleagues, however, and our copy does not establish that Berkers and colleagues performed this experiment. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reduced swelling of patient-derived rectal organoids correlated with clinical response parameters and could mimic individualized clinical responses to specific therapeutic regimens.

    “They demonstrated how reduced swelling of patient-derived rectal organoids correlated with clinical response parameters of patients and could mimic individualized clinical responses to specific therapeutic regimens191.”

    From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [191]

    The Methods section describes a swelling assay for bile-duct organoids, and the Results section reports CFTR dysfunction in organoids derived from a patient’s extrahepatic bile duct (pages unavailable). Our copy does not report rectal organoids, a correlation between swelling and clinical response parameters, or tests of individualized responses to therapeutic regimens; searches for those terms found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Heterogeneity in treatment responses is being exploited for the treatment of cystic fibrosis patients, with a large ongoing European multicentre clinical trial led by the HIT-Cystic Fibrosis consortium to identify potential responders.

    “This heterogeneity in treatment responses is now being exploited for the treatment of cystic fibrosis patients191, with a large ongoing European multicentre clinical trial study, led by the HIT-Cystic Fibrosis consortium, to identify potential responders214.”

    From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [191]

    The Results section (‘Modelling cystic fibrosis biliary disease in ECO’; page unavailable) describes organoids from one cystic fibrosis patient and suggests future personalized drug testing. Searches for HIT-Cystic Fibrosis and a European multicentre clinical trial found no passage in our copy establishing that such a trial is ongoing or identifying responders. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 86

Authors
Verstegen, M. M. A., Roos, F. J. M., Burka, K., Gehart, H., Jager, M., de Wolf, M., Bijvelds, M. J. C., de Jonge, H. R., Ardisasmita, A. I., van Huizen, N. A., Roest, H. P., de Jonge, J., Koch, M., Pampaloni, F., Fuchs, S. A., Schene, I. F., Luider, T. M., van der Doef, H. P. J., Bodewes, F. A. J. A., de Kleine, R. H. J., Spee, B., Kremers, G.-J., Clevers, H., IJzermans, J. N. M., Cuppen, E., & van der Laan, L. J. W.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NL)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Verstegen, Monique M. A.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-12-14
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
21900-21900
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112935818
Cited by
86
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12
FWCI
9.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Maag Lever Darm Stichting (MLDS-Diagnostiek D16-26)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
cholangiocyte organoids, extrahepatic bile ducts, intrahepatic bile ducts, cystic fibrosis, CFTR, Wnt signaling, organoid differentiation, chloride channels, common bile duct, disease modeling
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Bile Duct Diseases, Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic, Cell Differentiation, Cystic Fibrosis, Humans, Male, Organoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review