Cited by 312COVID-19 epidemiological studiesInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Years of life lost to COVID-19 in 81 countries

Open access
Pifarré i Arolas, Héctor, Acosta, Enrique, López-Casasnovas, Guillem, Lo, Adeline, Nicodemo, Catia, Riffe, Tim, Myrskylä, Mikko·2021·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Understanding the mortality impact of COVID-19 requires not only counting the dead, but analyzing how premature the deaths are. We calculate years of life lost (YLL) across 81 countries due to COVID-19 attributable deaths, and also conduct an analysis based on estimated excess deaths. We find that over 20.5 million years of life have been lost to COVID-19 globally. As of January 6, 2021, YLL in heavily affected countries are 2–9 times the average seasonal influenza; three quarters of the YLL result from deaths in ages below 75 and almost a third from deaths below 55; and men have lost 45% more life years than women. The results confirm the large mortality impact of COVID-19 among the elderly. They also call for heightened awareness in devising policies that protect vulnerable demographics losing the largest number of life-years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-83040-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 312

Authors
Pifarré i Arolas, H., Acosta, E., López-Casasnovas, G., Lo, A., Nicodemo, C., Riffe, T., & Myrskylä, M.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (DE)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-02-18
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
3504-3504
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3130240926
Cited by
312
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 148 · 2020: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
27.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • “la Caixa” Foundation (COVID-19)
  • University of Oxford
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/T008415/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, years of life lost, premature mortality, excess mortality, attributable mortality, age-specific mortality, sex differences in mortality, older adults, seasonal influenza comparison, vulnerable populations
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Cause of Death, Communicable Disease Control, Female, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, Global Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review