Cited by 81Molecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Selective time-dependent changes in activity and cell-specific gene expression in human postmortem brain

Open access
Dachet, Fabien, Brown, James B., Valyi-Nagy, Tibor, Narayan, Kunwar D., Serafini, Anna, Boley, Nathan, Gingeras, Thomas R., Celniker, Susan E. +2 more·2021·Scientific Reports

Abstract

As a means to understand human neuropsychiatric disorders from human brain samples, we compared the transcription patterns and histological features of postmortem brain to fresh human neocortex isolated immediately following surgical removal. Compared to a number of neuropsychiatric disease-associated postmortem transcriptomes, the fresh human brain transcriptome had an entirely unique transcriptional pattern. To understand this difference, we measured genome-wide transcription as a function of time after fresh tissue removal to mimic the postmortem interval. Within a few hours, a selective reduction in the number of neuronal activity-dependent transcripts occurred with relative preservation of housekeeping genes commonly used as a reference for RNA normalization. Gene clustering indicated a rapid reduction in neuronal gene expression with a reciprocal time-dependent increase in astroglial and microglial gene expression that continued to increase for at least 24 h after tissue resection. Predicted transcriptional changes were confirmed histologically on the same tissue demonstrating that while neurons were degenerating, glial cells underwent an outgrowth of their processes. The rapid loss of neuronal genes and reciprocal expression of glial genes highlights highly dynamic transcriptional and cellular changes that occur during the postmortem interval. Understanding these time-dependent changes in gene expression in post mortem brain samples is critical for the interpretation of research studies on human brain disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-85801-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DEGs showed no significant overlap with genes affected by post-mortem delay to autopsy.

    “showed no significant overlap with genes affected by post-mortem delay to autopsy27”
  • COVID-19 DEGs show no statistically significant overlap with brain PMI-sensitive genes (Fisher's exact test).

    “Comparison of post-mortem interval (PMI)-sensitive genes (left column, from a previous publication27) and COVID-19 DEGs (all other columns). No statistically significant overlap is observed (Fisher’s exact test).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 81

Authors
Dachet, F., Brown, J. B., Valyi-Nagy, T., Narayan, K. D., Serafini, A., Boley, N., Gingeras, T. R., Celniker, S. E., Mohapatra, G., & Loeb, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
  • Dachet, Fabien
  • Loeb, Jeffrey A.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-03-23
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
6078-6078
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3139191888
Cited by
81
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (NS109515)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH (UL1TR002003)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
postmortem brain, postmortem interval, time-dependent gene expression, human neocortex, housekeeping gene normalization, microglial gene expression, neurodegeneration, neuropsychiatric disorders, brain histology
MeSH terms
Autopsy, Brain, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Neurons, Organ Specificity, Biomarkers, Gene Expression, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review