Depression predictions from GPS-based mobility do not generalize well to large demographically heterogeneous samples
Open accessAbstract
Depression is one of the most common mental health issues in the United States, affecting the lives of millions of people suffering from it as well as those close to them. Recent advances in research on mobile sensing technologies and machine learning have suggested that a person's depression can be passively measured by observing patterns in people's mobility behaviors. However, the majority of work in this area has relied on highly homogeneous samples, most frequently college students. In this study, we analyse over 57 million GPS data points to show that the same procedure that leads to high prediction accuracy in a homogeneous student sample (N = 57; AUC = 0.82), leads to accuracies only slightly higher than chance in a U.S.-wide sample that is heterogeneous in its socio-demographic composition as well as mobility patterns (N = 5,262; AUC = 0.57). This pattern holds across three different modelling approaches which consider both linear and non-linear relationships. Further analyses suggest that the prediction accuracy is low across different socio-demographic groups, and that training the models on more homogeneous subsamples does not substantially improve prediction accuracy. Overall, the findings highlight the challenge of applying mobility-based predictions of depression at scale.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A large-scale study demonstrated that depression prediction accuracies using a heterogeneous student sample (n=57) did not generalise to a more representative, heterogeneous sample (n=5,262).
“a large-scale study by (45) demonstrated that depression prediction accuracies using a heterogeneous student sample (n=57) did not generalise once models were applied to a more representative, heterogeneous sample (n=5,262).”
From Personalised depression forecasting using mobile sensor data and ecological momentary assessment (2022) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 51
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [25]Barr, A. Google mistakenly tags black people as ’gorillas,’ showing limits of algorithms. The Wall Street Journal (2015).
- [51]Min J-K Toss’n’turn: Smartphone as sleep and sleep quality detector Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 2014 ACM 477 486
- Authors
- Müller, S. R., Chen, X., Peters, H., Chaintreau, A., & Matz, S. C.
- Affiliations
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Müller, Sandrine R.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2021-07-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14007-14007
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8263566
- OpenAlex
- W3181625273
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Universität Bielefeld
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Keywords
- depression prediction, mobile sensing, generalizability, demographic heterogeneity, socio-demographic groups, movement patterns
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Population Surveillance, Social Mobility, Students, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Geographic Information Systems, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review