Cited by 51Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisMental Health Research TopicsMental Health via Writing

Depression predictions from GPS-based mobility do not generalize well to large demographically heterogeneous samples

Open access
Müller, Sandrine R., Chen, Xi, Peters, Heinrich, Chaintreau, Augustin, Matz, Sandra C.·2021·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Depression is one of the most common mental health issues in the United States, affecting the lives of millions of people suffering from it as well as those close to them. Recent advances in research on mobile sensing technologies and machine learning have suggested that a person's depression can be passively measured by observing patterns in people's mobility behaviors. However, the majority of work in this area has relied on highly homogeneous samples, most frequently college students. In this study, we analyse over 57 million GPS data points to show that the same procedure that leads to high prediction accuracy in a homogeneous student sample (N = 57; AUC = 0.82), leads to accuracies only slightly higher than chance in a U.S.-wide sample that is heterogeneous in its socio-demographic composition as well as mobility patterns (N = 5,262; AUC = 0.57). This pattern holds across three different modelling approaches which consider both linear and non-linear relationships. Further analyses suggest that the prediction accuracy is low across different socio-demographic groups, and that training the models on more homogeneous subsamples does not substantially improve prediction accuracy. Overall, the findings highlight the challenge of applying mobility-based predictions of depression at scale.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-93087-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large-scale study demonstrated that depression prediction accuracies using a heterogeneous student sample (n=57) did not generalise to a more representative, heterogeneous sample (n=5,262).

    “a large-scale study by (45) demonstrated that depression prediction accuracies using a heterogeneous student sample (n=57) did not generalise once models were applied to a more representative, heterogeneous sample (n=5,262).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 51

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25]Barr, A. Google mistakenly tags black people as ’gorillas,’ showing limits of algorithms. The Wall Street Journal (2015).
  2. [51]Min J-K Toss’n’turn: Smartphone as sleep and sleep quality detector Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems 2014 ACM 477 486

Authors
Müller, S. R., Chen, X., Peters, H., Chaintreau, A., & Matz, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Müller, Sandrine R.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-07-07
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
14007-14007
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3181625273
Cited by
51
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universität Bielefeld
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
depression prediction, mobile sensing, generalizability, demographic heterogeneity, socio-demographic groups, movement patterns
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Population Surveillance, Social Mobility, Students, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Geographic Information Systems, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review