Calling the amino acid sequence of a protein/peptide from the nanospectrum produced by a sub-nanometer diameter pore
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The blockade current that develops when a protein translocates across a thin membrane through a sub-nanometer diameter pore informs with extreme sensitivity on the sequence of amino acids that constitute the protein. The current blockade signals measured during the translocation are called a nanospectrum of the protein. Whereas mass spectrometry (MS) is still the dominant technology for protein identification, it suffers limitations. In proteome-wide studies, MS identifies proteins by database search but often fails to provide high protein sequence coverage. It is also not very sensitive requiring about a femtomole for protein identification. Compared with MS, a sub-nanometer diameter pore (i.e. a sub-nanopore) directly reads the amino acids constituting a single protein molecule, but efficient computational tools are still required for processing and interpreting nanospectra. Here, we delineate computational methods for processing sub-nanopore nanospectra and predicting theoretical nanospectra from protein sequences, which are essential for protein identification.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Proteoform: a single term describing protein complexity
The Consortium for Top Down Proteomics, Smith, L. M., & Kelleher, N. L. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2369 · Cited by 1,528 · see citing works
How many human proteoforms are there?
Aebersold, R., Agar, J. N., Amster, I. J., Baker, M. S., Bertozzi, C. R., Boja, E. S., Costello, C. E., Cravatt, B. F., Fenselau, C., Garcia, B. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2576 · Cited by 907 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Liu, X., Dong, Z., & Timp, G.
- Affiliations
- Tulane University (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Xiaowen
- Timp, Gregory
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2022-10-25
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17853-17853
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9596471
- OpenAlex
- W4307201121
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Open Philanthropy Project
- Keough-Hesburgh Professorship
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- nanopore sequencing, protein translocation, amino acid sequence determination, protein identification, single-molecule protein sequencing
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Amino Acids, Peptides, Proteome, Nanopores
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review