Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 14Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesIndustrial Gas Emission ControlIonic liquids properties and applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

One-Step Preparation of Deep Eutectic Solvents/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite Materials for the Removal of Dibenzothiophene in Fuel Oil

Open access
Liu, Yue, Su, Xiaoping, Cui, Yingna, Zhou, Xin·2023·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Deep eutectic solvents (DES)/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) composite materials can remove dibenzothiophene (DBT) from fuel oil by adsorption desulfurization. However, the whole synthesis process is complicated, and the DES/rGO is high-cost and not strong enough, which limits its application in industry. Therefore, a one-step method to produce DES/rGO composite materials is proposed. The performance of desulfurization was studied and the feasibility of industrial application was analyzed. First, the proposed method can improve the single extraction efficiency to 94.8% without a complicated process. Secondly, the DES/rGO can also be reused and recycled. Third, the proposed method overcomes the inconvenient storage and transportation of liquid DES. Finally, the proposed method could effectively reduce the cost of desulphurization in the industry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-023-28041-0

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 The preparation of TBAC/ p-TsOH.
Figure 1 The preparation of TBAC/ p-TsOH.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 The effect of adding oxidant on extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g composite material, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).
Figure 2 The effect of adding oxidant on extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g composite material, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 The effect of different oxidants on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g (TBAC/2p-TsOH)/rGO, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).
Figure 3 The effect of different oxidants on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g (TBAC/2p-TsOH)/rGO, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 The effect of oxidant amount on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g (TBAC/2p-TsOH)/rGO, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).
Figure 4 The effect of oxidant amount on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g (TBAC/2p-TsOH)/rGO, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 The effect of different loading amounts of TBAC/2p-TsOH on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g (TBAC/2p-TsOH)/rGO, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 0.25 g H2O2, 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).
Figure 5 The effect of different loading amounts of TBAC/2p-TsOH on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g (TBAC/2p-TsOH)/rGO, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 0.25 g H2O2, 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 The effect of the amount of composite materials on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1600 mg/L sulphur content, 0.25 g H2O2, 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).
Figure 6 The effect of the amount of composite materials on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1600 mg/L sulphur content, 0.25 g H2O2, 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 The effect of system temperature on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g composite material, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 800 rpm, 60 min).
Figure 7 The effect of system temperature on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g composite material, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 800 rpm, 60 min).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 The effect of extraction time on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g composite material, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 25 °C, 800 rpm).
Figure 8 The effect of extraction time on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g composite material, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 25 °C, 800 rpm).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 9 The effect of rotation speed on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g composite material, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 25 °C, 60 min).
Figure 9 The effect of rotation speed on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g composite material, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 25 °C, 60 min).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 10 The effect of repeated use on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g (TBAC/2p-TsOH)/rGO, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 0.25 g H2O2, 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).
Figure 10 The effect of repeated use on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g (TBAC/2p-TsOH)/rGO, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 0.25 g H2O2, 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 11 The effect of recycling on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g (TBAC/2p-TsOH)/rGO, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 0.25 g H2O2, 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).
Figure 11 The effect of recycling on the extraction efficiency (experimental conditions: 1.2 g (TBAC/2p-TsOH)/rGO, 0.5 g simulated oil (1600 mg/L sulphur content), 0.25 g H2O2, 25 °C, 800 rpm, 60 min).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 12 TGA curve of DES/rGO and DES/rGO after desulfurization.
Figure 12 TGA curve of DES/rGO and DES/rGO after desulfurization.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 13 Infrared curve of DBT, DES/rGO, DES/rGO after desulfurization.
Figure 13 Infrared curve of DBT, DES/rGO, DES/rGO after desulfurization.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Y., Su, X., Cui, Y., & Zhou, X.
Affiliations
Dalian University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Yue
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2023-01-16
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
832-832
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4316469838
Cited by
14
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21606031, 21473183)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Ionic liquids properties and applications
Keywords
deep eutectic solvents, reduced graphene oxide, composite adsorbent, dibenzothiophene, fuel oil desulfurization, adsorptive desulfurization, one-step synthesis, adsorbent reusability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.