Cited by 24Biosensors and Analytical DetectionSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

Machine learning at the edge for AI-enabled multiplexed pathogen detection

Open access
Ganjalizadeh, Vahid, Meena, Gopikrishnan G., Stott, Matthew A., Hawkins, Aaron R., Schmidt, Holger·2023·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Multiplexed detection of biomarkers in real-time is crucial for sensitive and accurate diagnosis at the point of use. This scenario poses tremendous challenges for detection and identification of signals of varying shape and quality at the edge of the signal-to-noise limit. Here, we demonstrate a robust target identification scheme that utilizes a Deep Neural Network (DNN) for multiplex detection of single particles and molecular biomarkers. The model combines fast wavelet particle detection with Short-Time Fourier Transform analysis, followed by DNN identification on an AI-specific edge device (Google Coral Dev board). The approach is validated using multi-spot optical excitation of Klebsiella Pneumoniae bacterial nucleic acids flowing through an optofluidic waveguide chip that produces fluorescence signals of varying amplitude, duration, and quality. Amplification-free 3× multiplexing in real-time is demonstrated with excellent specificity, sensitivity, and a classification accuracy of 99.8%. These results show that a minimalistic DNN design optimized for mobile devices provides a robust framework for accurate pathogen detection using compact, low-cost diagnostic devices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-023-31694-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This approach was validated through multi-spot optical excitation of Klebsiella Pneumoniae bacterial nucleic acids flowing through an optofluidic waveguide chip, generating fluorescence signals with varying amplitude, duration, and quality.

    “This approach was validated through the multi-spot optical excitation of Klebsiella Pneumoniae bacterial nucleic acids flowing through an optofluidic waveguide chip, generating fluorescence signals with varying amplitude, duration, and quality.”
  • A deep neural network (DNN) can be employed for multiplex detection of single particles and molecular biomarkers.

    “Moreover, it was shown that a deep neural network (DNN) for the multiplex detection of single particles and molecular biomarkers can be employed [24].”
  • The AI model could integrate rapid wavelet particle detection with short-time Fourier Transform analysis, followed by DNN identification on a specialized AI device.

    “The AI model could integrate rapid wavelet particle detection with short-time Fourier Transform analysis, followed by DNN identification on a specialized AI device.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 24

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [72]Wager, S., Wang, S. & Liang, P. S. Dropout training as adaptive regularization. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 26 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2013).

Authors
Ganjalizadeh, V., Meena, G. G., Stott, M. A., Hawkins, A. R., & Schmidt, H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Holger
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2023-03-23
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
4744-4744
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4360619552
Cited by
24
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1703058)
  • Cisco Systems
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI116989)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB028608)
  • Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
multiplex pathogen detection, edge computing, deep neural network, short-time Fourier transform, Klebsiella pneumoniae, nucleic acid detection, point-of-care testing
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Fluorescence, Nucleic Acids, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review