Cited by 7Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingSolidification and crystal growth phenomenaMathematical Biology Tumor Growth

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Numerical and experimental investigation of multi-species bacterial co-aggregation

Open access

Abstract

This paper deals with the mathematical modeling of bacterial co-aggregation and its numerical implementation in a FEM framework. Since the concept of co-aggregation refers to the physical binding between cells of different microbial species, a system composed of two species is considered in the modeling framework. The extension of the model to an arbitrary number of species is straightforward. In addition to two-species (multi-species growth) dynamics, the transport of a nutritional substance and the extent of co-aggregation are introduced into the model as the third and fourth primary variables. A phase-field modeling approach is employed to describe the co-aggregation between the two species. The mathematical model is three-dimensional and fully based on the continuum description of the problem without any need for discrete agents which are the key elements of the individual-based modeling approach. It is shown that the use of a phase-field-based model is equivalent to a particular form of classical diffusion-reaction systems. Unlike the so-called mixture models, the evolution of each component of the multi-species system is captured thanks to the inherent capability of phase-field modeling in treating systems consisting of distinct multi-phases. The details of numerical implementation in a FEM framework are also presented. Indeed, a new multi-field user element is developed and implemented in ANSYS for this multiphysics problem. Predictions of the model are compared with the experimental observations. By that, the versatility and applicability of the model and the numerical tool are well established.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-023-38806-2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biofilm formation is initiated by specific primary colonizers that adhere to mucosal and dental surfaces and serve as a foundation for other bacteria through specific adhesin-receptor interactions.

    “Biofilm formation is initiated by specific bacteria that are considered ‘primary colonizers’ because they adhere to mucosal and dental surfaces and serve as a foundation to which other bacteria can attach and join the community through specific adhesin-receptor interactions [1–3].”

    From Coaggregation of oral pathogens by postbiotic lactobacilli (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction (page not available) says primary colonizers bind oral surfaces, identifies streptococci and actinomyces as primary colonizers of tooth surfaces, and explains that secondary colonizers rely on other organisms to join the community. It also describes specific lectin–receptor interactions in co-aggregation. The copy does not specifically establish adhesion to mucosal surfaces, so that part of the claim is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the oral cavity, coaggregation plays a crucial role in the formation and stability of dental biofilm and thus influences oral health and disease.

    “In the oral cavity, coaggregation plays a crucial role in the formation and stability of dental biofilm, and it thus influences oral health and disease.”

    From Coaggregation of oral pathogens by postbiotic lactobacilli (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 7

Metadata

Authors
Soleimani, M., Szafranski, S. P., Qu, T., Mukherjee, R., Stiesch, M., Wriggers, P., & Junker, P.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Soleimani, Meisam
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2023-07-22
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
11839-11839
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385073911
Cited by
7
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Leibniz Universität Hannover (cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR298 (Project No. 426335750))
  • Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Keywords
phase-field simulation, reaction-diffusion systems, ANSYS, finite element implementation, multiphysics simulation, nutrient transport, mixture models
MeSH terms
Diffusion, Physical Examination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review