Cited by 16Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesCell Image Analysis TechniquesForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications

Accelerating the characterization of dynamic DNA origami devices with deep neural networks

Open access
Wang, Yuchen, Jin, Xin, Castro, Carlos·2023·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Mechanical characterization of dynamic DNA nanodevices is essential to facilitate their use in applications like molecular diagnostics, force sensing, and nanorobotics that rely on device reconfiguration and interactions with other materials. A common approach to evaluate the mechanical properties of dynamic DNA nanodevices is by quantifying conformational distributions, where the magnitude of fluctuations correlates to the stiffness. This is generally carried out through manual measurement from experimental images, which is a tedious process and a critical bottleneck in the characterization pipeline. While many tools support the analysis of static molecular structures, there is a need for tools to facilitate the rapid characterization of dynamic DNA devices that undergo large conformational fluctuations. Here, we develop a data processing pipeline based on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to address this problem. The YOLOv5 and Resnet50 network architecture were used for the two key subtasks: particle detection and pose (i.e. conformation) estimation. We demonstrate effective network performance (F1 score 0.85 in particle detection) and good agreement with experimental distributions with limited user input and small training sets (~ 5 to 10 images). We also demonstrate this pipeline can be applied to multiple nanodevices, providing a robust approach for the rapid characterization of dynamic DNA devices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-023-41459-w

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Jin, X., & Castro, C.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Yuchen
  • Castro, Carlos
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2023-09-14
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
15196-15196
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386746143
Cited by
16
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (1921881)
  • Division of Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (1933344)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
DNA origami, mechanical characterization, conformational fluctuations, particle detection, pose estimation, YOLOv5, ResNet50, deep neural network, image processing pipeline, nanorobotics
MeSH terms
DNA, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review