Accelerating the characterization of dynamic DNA origami devices with deep neural networks
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Mechanical characterization of dynamic DNA nanodevices is essential to facilitate their use in applications like molecular diagnostics, force sensing, and nanorobotics that rely on device reconfiguration and interactions with other materials. A common approach to evaluate the mechanical properties of dynamic DNA nanodevices is by quantifying conformational distributions, where the magnitude of fluctuations correlates to the stiffness. This is generally carried out through manual measurement from experimental images, which is a tedious process and a critical bottleneck in the characterization pipeline. While many tools support the analysis of static molecular structures, there is a need for tools to facilitate the rapid characterization of dynamic DNA devices that undergo large conformational fluctuations. Here, we develop a data processing pipeline based on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to address this problem. The YOLOv5 and Resnet50 network architecture were used for the two key subtasks: particle detection and pose (i.e. conformation) estimation. We demonstrate effective network performance (F1 score 0.85 in particle detection) and good agreement with experimental distributions with limited user input and small training sets (~ 5 to 10 images). We also demonstrate this pipeline can be applied to multiple nanodevices, providing a robust approach for the rapid characterization of dynamic DNA devices.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Jocher, G., Stoken, A., Borovec, J., NanoCode012, ChristopherSTAN, Changyu, L., Laughing, Hogan, A., Lorenzomammana, Tkianai, et al. (2020) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3983579 · Cited by 2,738 · see citing works
Diverse and robust molecular algorithms using reprogrammable DNA self-assembly
Woods, D., Doty, D., Myhrvold, C., Hui, J., Zhou, F., Yin, P., & Winfree, E. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1014-9 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Combining structured and unstructured data for predictive models: a deep learning approach
Zhang, D., Yin, C., Zeng, J., Yuan, X., & Zhang, P. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01297-6 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Jin, X., & Castro, C.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Yuchen
- Castro, Carlos
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2023-09-14
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15196-15196
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10502017
- OpenAlex
- W4386746143
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (1921881)
- Division of Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (1933344)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- DNA origami, mechanical characterization, conformational fluctuations, particle detection, pose estimation, YOLOv5, ResNet50, deep neural network, image processing pipeline, nanorobotics
- MeSH terms
- DNA, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review