Global birdsong embeddings enable superior transfer learning for bioacoustic classification
Open accessAbstract
Automated bioacoustic analysis aids understanding and protection of both marine and terrestrial animals and their habitats across extensive spatiotemporal scales, and typically involves analyzing vast collections of acoustic data. With the advent of deep learning models, classification of important signals from these datasets has markedly improved. These models power critical data analyses for research and decision-making in biodiversity monitoring, animal behaviour studies, and natural resource management. However, deep learning models are often data-hungry and require a significant amount of labeled training data to perform well. While sufficient training data is available for certain taxonomic groups (e.g., common bird species), many classes (such as rare and endangered species, many non-bird taxa, and call-type) lack enough data to train a robust model from scratch. This study investigates the utility of feature embeddings extracted from audio classification models to identify bioacoustic classes other than the ones these models were originally trained on. We evaluate models on diverse datasets, including different bird calls and dialect types, bat calls, marine mammals calls, and amphibians calls. The embeddings extracted from the models trained on bird vocalization data consistently allowed higher quality classification than the embeddings trained on general audio datasets. The results of this study indicate that high-quality feature embeddings from large-scale acoustic bird classifiers can be harnessed for few-shot transfer learning, enabling the learning of new classes from a limited quantity of training data. Our findings reveal the potential for efficient analyses of novel bioacoustic tasks, even in scenarios where available training data is limited to a few samples.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transfer learning with embeddings from massive avian models like BirdNET or platforms such as OpenSoundscape is surprisingly general: with just a handful of labeled examples per class, researchers can fine-tune these systems for entirely new habitats, species, or whole taxonomic groups.
“Embeddings from massive avian models like BirdNET or platforms such as OpenSoundscape have turned out to be surprisingly general: with just a handful of labeled examples per class, researchers can fine-tune these systems for entirely new habitats, species, or even whole taxonomic groups”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Ghani et al. 2023
Machine-learning models remain heavily dependent on labeled training data, which are unevenly distributed across taxa and regions.
“Machine-learning models remain heavily dependent on labeled training data, which are unevenly distributed across taxa and regions”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Ghani et al. 2023
Embeddings derived from large avian recognition systems such as BirdNET, which also form the acoustic feature backbone of pipelines like Perch 2.0, have proven surprisingly general, allowing rapid adaptation of models to new species and environments, including amphibians, bats, and cetaceans.
“Embeddings derived from large avian recognition systems such as BirdNET (Pérez-Granados 2023) which also form the acoustic feature backbone of pipelines like Perch 2.0 (van Merriënboer et al. 2025) have proven surprisingly general, allowing rapid adaptation of models to new species and environments, including amphibians, bats, and cetaceans”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Ghani et al. 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 167
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [23]Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y. & Lipson, H. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst.27 (2014).
- [27]J. Turian, J. Shier, H. R. Khan, B. Raj, B. W. Schuller, C. J. Steinmetz, C. Malloy, G. Tzanetakis, G. Velarde, K. McNally, et al. Hear: Holistic evaluation of audio representations. in NeurIPS 2021 Competitions and Demonstrations Track, pp. 125–145. PMLR (2022).
- [39]W.-Y. Chen, Y.-C. Liu, Z. Kira, Y.-C. Wang, and J.-B. Huang. A closer look at few-shot classification. in International Conference on Learning Representations. (2019).
- [40]X. Wang, T.E. Huang, T. Darrell, J.E. Gonzalez, and F. Yu. Frustratingly simple few-shot object detection. in Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’20. JMLR.org (2020).
- [43]Hinton, G. E. & Roweis, S. Stochastic neighbor embedding. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst.15, 857–864 (2002).
- [45]J. F. Gemmeke, D. P. W. Ellis, D. Freedman, A. Jansen, W. Lawrence, R. C. Moore, M. Plakal, and M. Ritter. Audio set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events. in Proc. IEEE ICASSP 2017, New Orleans, LA (2017).
- [53]P.-Y. Huang, L. Juncheng & B. Alexei. Michael Auli (Florian Metze, and Christoph Feichtenhofer. Masked autoencoders that listen. in NeurIPS, Wojciech Galuba (2022).
- Authors
- Ghani, B., Denton, T., Kahl, S., & Klinck, H.
- Affiliations
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL)
- Google (United States) (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ghani, Burooj
- Denton, Tom
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2023-12-18
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22876-22876
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10739890
- OpenAlex
- W4390060493
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 20.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- The Digital Academic Repository of Naturalis Biodiversity Center (Naturalis Biodiversity Center) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- AuTag BeoFisch (LFF-FV91)
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FKZ 01-S22072)
- Federal Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (FKZ 67KI31040E)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- transfer learning, few-shot learning, bioacoustic classification, bird calls, dialects, bat calls, rare and endangered species, biodiversity monitoring, animal behavior
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Birds, Language, Mammals, Ecosystem, Endangered Species
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review