Cited by 6Tactile and Sensory InteractionsNeural dynamics and brain functionMultisensory perception and integration

Sensory adaptation in the barrel cortex during active sensation in the behaving mouse

Open access
Colins Rodriguez, Andrea, Loft, Michaela S. E., Schiessl, Ingo, Maravall, Miguel, Petersen, Rasmus S.·2024·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Sensory Adaptation (SA) is a prominent aspect of how neurons respond to sensory signals, ubiquitous across species and modalities. However, SA depends on the activation state of the brain and the extent to which SA is expressed in awake, behaving animals during active sensation remains unclear. Here, we addressed this question by training head-fixed mice to detect an object using their whiskers and recording neuronal activity from barrel cortex whilst simultaneously imaging the whiskers in 3D. We found that neuronal responses decreased during the course of whisker-object touch sequences and that this was due to two factors. First, a motor effect, whereby, during a sequence of touches, later touches were mechanically weaker than early ones. Second, a sensory encoding effect, whereby neuronal tuning to touch became progressively less sensitive during the course of a touch sequence. The sensory encoding effect was whisker-specific. These results show that SA does occur during active whisker sensing and suggest that SA is fundamental to sensation during natural behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-024-70524-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During epochs 1 and 5, nearly stationary neural activity is observed for population- and trial-averaged activity and single units, indicating strong adaptation to repetitive palpating events.

    “However, for both epochs, a nearly stationary neural activity is observed for both population- and trial-averaged activity (Fig. 1 J and K) as well as for single unit activity, which is highly reproducible across all trials (SI Appendix, Fig. S5) indicating strong adaptation (18) of neural population to these repetitive palpating events.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 69 · Cited by 6

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Maravall, M. Adaptation and sensory coding. In Principles of neural coding (eds Quian Quiroga, R. & Panzeri, P.) 357–378 (CRC Press, 2013).
  2. [41]Marsh, D. Applied Geometry for Computer Graphics and CAD 2nd edn. (Springer, 2006).

Authors
Colins Rodriguez, A., Loft, M. S. E., Schiessl, I., Maravall, M., & Petersen, R. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Petersen, Rasmus S.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-09-16
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
21588-21588
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402580708
Cited by
6
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (72170371)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/V00817X/1, BB/L007282/1, BB/ P021603/1)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L01064X7/1, MR/ P005659/1)
  • Weizmann UK Making Connections
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
sensory adaptation, barrel cortex, object detection, neural responses, tactile sensitivity, natural behavior, head-fixed mice
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Sensation, Somatosensory Cortex, Touch, Vibrissae, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review