Cited by 3RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein Structure and DynamicsRNA regulation and disease

Comprehensive datasets for RNA design, machine learning, and beyond

Open access
Badura, Jan, Rybarczyk, Agnieszka, Zok, Tomasz·2025·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

RNA molecules are essential in regulating biological processes such as gene expression, cellular differentiation, and development. Accurately predicting RNA secondary structures and designing sequences that fold into specific configurations remain significant challenges in computational biology, with far-reaching implications for medicine, synthetic biology, and biotechnology. While machine learning methodologies have been proposed to enhance prediction capabilities, they require high-quality training data. The lack of standardized benchmark datasets further hinders the development and evaluation of these tools. To address this, we created a comprehensive dataset of over 320 thousand instances from experimentally validated sources to establish a new community-wide benchmark for RNA design and modeling algorithms. Our dataset comprises numerous challenging structures for which state-of-the-art RNA inverse folders provide results of varying accuracy. We demonstrated the potential of the dataset by testing it with several popular open-source RNA design algorithms. Furthermore, we illustrated how our dataset can be used to train machine learning models that consider both RNA sequence and structure, potentially advancing RNA design and prediction capabilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-025-07041-2

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Badura, J., Rybarczyk, A., & Zok, T.
Affiliations
  • Poznań University of Technology (PL)
  • Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-07-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
21417-21417
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411867348
Cited by
3
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki (2023/51/D/ST6/01207)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
RNA secondary structure prediction, RNA design, benchmark dataset, machine learning training data, synthetic biology
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review