Cited by 1Agriculture and Farm SafetyMental Health Treatment and AccessCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Comparative analysis of mental health among Austrian farmers and the general population

Open access
Humer, Elke, Pieh, Christoph, Zeldovich, Marina, Neubauer, Viktoria·2026·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Although farmers face significant mental health challenges globally, no studies have explored this issue in German-speaking countries. This study is the first to assess the mental health of Austrian farmers, comparing their well-being to that of the general population. A cross-sectional online survey targeting Austrian farmers was conducted between October 4, 2024, and February 28, 2025, with 2,006 farmers completing the survey voluntarily. In parallel, a representative sample of the adult Austrian general population was surveyed from October 10–28, 2024, resulting in a final sample of 2,007 participants. Standardized self-report instruments were used to assess depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), insomnia (ISI-2), perceived stress (PSS-4), and alcohol abuse (CAGE). Group differences were evaluated using chi-square tests and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses, adjusting for age and gender. Analyses revealed that Austrian farmers reported significantly higher levels of depression (28.0% vs. 21.4%), anxiety (31.1% vs. 14.6%), insomnia (15.3% vs. 9.0%), and perceived stress (66.9% vs. 51.0%) compared to the general population, whereas the opposite was observed for alcohol abuse (15.8% vs. 20.7%). Adjusted odds ratios confirm that the farming community is at an increased risk for adverse mental health outcomes (ranging from 1.80 to 3.25), except for alcohol misuse (0.75). The findings underscore a substantial mental health burden among Austrian farmers and highlight the urgent need for tailored interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-026-65607-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 1

Authors
Humer, E., Pieh, C., Zeldovich, M., & Neubauer, V.
Affiliations
  • Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien (AT)
  • Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Humer, Elke
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-08-07
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7201831698
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
farmer mental health, agricultural labor, depression, anxiety, insomnia, perceived stress, alcohol abuse, general population comparison, workplace mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review