In the name of reproducibility
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reporting the correct nomenclature is crucial to understanding the data and ensuring that the research is discoverable and replicable.
“Reporting the correct nomenclature is crucial to understanding the data and ensuring that the research is discoverable and replicable [116–118].”
From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [116]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Vasilevsky, N. A., Brush, M. H., Paddock, H., Ponting, L., Tripathy, S. J., LaRocca, G. M., & Haendel, M. A. (2013) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.148 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Vasilevsky, N. A. et al. PeerJ 1, e148 (2013).
- Reardon, S. Nature 551, 281 (2017).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0
Percie du Sert, N., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., et al. (2020) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411 · Cited by 2,677 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mallapaty, S.
- Corresponding author
- Mallapaty, Smriti
- Venue
- Lab Animal
- Published
- 2018-06-25
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 178-181
- ISSN
- 0093-7355 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-4475
- OpenAlex
- W2809645704
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lab Animal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- reproducibility, research replicability, research waste, discoverability, animal experimentation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Mice, Inbred Strains, Mice, Mutant Strains, Terminology as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
