Cited by 115Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPhysical Activity and HealthDigital Mental Health Interventions

A systematic umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis of eHealth and mHealth interventions for improving lifestyle behaviours

Open access
Singh, Ben, Ahmed, Mavra, Staiano, Amanda E., Gough, Claire, Petersen, Jasmine, Vandelanotte, Corneel, Kracht, Chelsea, Huong, Christopher +10 more·2024·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

The aim of this meta-meta-analysis was to systematically review randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence examining the effectiveness of e- and m-Health interventions designed to improve physical activity, sedentary behaviour, healthy eating and sleep. Nine electronic databases were searched for eligible studies published from inception to 1 June 2023. Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of RCTs that evaluate e- and m-Health interventions designed to improve physical activity, sedentary behaviour, sleep and healthy eating in any adult population were included. Forty-seven meta-analyses were included, comprising of 507 RCTs and 206,873 participants. Interventions involved mobile apps, web-based and SMS interventions, with 14 focused on physical activity, 3 for diet, 4 for sleep and 26 evaluating multiple behaviours. Meta-meta-analyses showed that e- and m-Health interventions resulted in improvements in steps/day (mean difference, MD = 1329 [95% CI = 593.9, 2065.7] steps/day), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MD = 55.1 [95% CI = 13.8, 96.4] min/week), total physical activity (MD = 44.8 [95% CI = 21.6, 67.9] min/week), sedentary behaviour (MD = −426.3 [95% CI = −850.2, −2.3] min/week), fruit and vegetable consumption (MD = 0.57 [95% CI = 0.11, 1.02] servings/day), energy intake (MD = −102.9 kcals/day), saturated fat consumption (MD = −5.5 grams/day), and bodyweight (MD = −1.89 [95% CI = −2.42, −1.36] kg). Analyses based on standardised mean differences (SMD) showed improvements in sleep quality (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.40, 0.72) and insomnia severity (SMD = −0.90, 95% CI = −1.14, −0.65). Most subgroup analyses were not significant, suggesting that a variety of e- and m-Health interventions are effective across diverse age and health populations. These interventions offer scalable and accessible approaches to help individuals adopt and sustain healthier behaviours, with implications for broader public health and healthcare challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-024-01172-y

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, B., Ahmed, M., Staiano, A. E., Gough, C., Petersen, J., Vandelanotte, C., Kracht, C., Huong, C., Yin, Z., Vasiloglou, M. F., Pan, C.-C., Short, C. E., Mclaughlin, M., von Klinggraeff, L., Pfledderer, C. D., Moran, L. J., Button, A. M., & Maher, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Central Queensland University (AU)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
  • Nestlé (Switzerland) (CH)
  • University of Bremen (DE)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Singh, Ben
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2024-07-05
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
179-179
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400349581
Cited by
115
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 3
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PUBLISSO (German National Library of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (ARC) Future Fellowship
  • Société des Produits Nestlé SA
  • Leibniz ScienceCampus Bremen Digital Public Health
  • Victoria Cancer Agency Mid-Career Fellowship
  • Research Council's Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course
  • Veski Fellowship
  • Medical Research Future Fund Emerging Leader Grant
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
digital health interventions, mobile health intervention, mobile health apps, lifestyle modification, physical activity, sedentary behavior, healthy eating, sleep quality, insomnia, fruit and vegetable intake, energy intake, body weight, online intervention, text messaging intervention, umbrella review, meta-meta-analysis, adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review