Cited by 38Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingMachine Learning in HealthcareAI in cancer detection

Multimodal deep learning for cancer prognosis prediction with clinical information prompts integration

Open access
Hou, Jiaxin, Zhang, Ranran, Xie, Yaoqin, Li, Chao, Qin, Wenjian·2025·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

Survival prediction is crucial for guiding cancer treatment and evaluating therapeutic efficacy. However, tumor heterogeneity presents challenges of accurate prognosis. Multimodal learning, which integrates data from imaging, genomics, and clinical records, offers a promising approach for this complex task. While recent studies mainly focus on imaging and genomic data, clinical information, which reflecting patients' overall health, remains underutilized due to its discrete, sparse, and low-dimensional characteristics. We propose SurvPGC, an integrated model combining pathology images, genomic data and clinical records for cancer prognosis. Clinical information is transformed into high-dimensional vectors using text templates and foundation models, enabling their integration through a cross-attention module. Validation on three datasets of The Cancer Genome Atlas demonstrated that the model effectively captures modality-specific features, with attention visualization revealing distinct focus areas across data types. This highlights the importance of incorporating diverse information sources for improved survival prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-025-02257-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 38

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [19]Holste, G. et al. End-to-end learning of fused image and non-image features for improved breast cancer classification from MRI. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. 2021, 3287–3296 (2021).
  2. [21]Radford, A. et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 139, 8748–8763 (2021).
  3. [33]Klambauer, G. et al.Self-normalizing neural networks, In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems2017, 972–981 (2017).
  4. [34]Ilse, M., Tomczak, J. M. & Welling, M. Attention-based deep multiple instance learning. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR80, 2127–2136 (2018).
  5. [35]Shao, Z. et al. TransMIL: transformer based correlated multiple instance learning for whole slide image classification. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 3, 2136–2147 (2021).
  6. [44]Fan, L., Krishnan, D., Isola, P., Katabi, D. & Tian, Y. Improving CLIP training with language rewrites. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Systems36, 35544-35575 (2023).
  7. [53]Vaswani, A., et al. Attention is all you need. 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017)30, 5998–6008 (2017).

Authors
Hou, J., Zhang, R., Xie, Y., Li, C., & Qin, W.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Qin, Wenjian
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-12-27
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
76-76
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7117365250
Cited by
38
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 38
FWCI
21.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62271475)
  • Shenzhen-Hong Kong Joint Lab on Intelligence Computational Analysis for Tumor Imaging (E3G111)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2022365)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
cancer prognosis prediction, survival prediction, multimodal deep learning, clinical data integration, text templates, foundation models, cross-attention, pathology images, genomic data, medical records, tumor heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review