Multimodal deep learning for cancer prognosis prediction with clinical information prompts integration
Open accessAbstract
Survival prediction is crucial for guiding cancer treatment and evaluating therapeutic efficacy. However, tumor heterogeneity presents challenges of accurate prognosis. Multimodal learning, which integrates data from imaging, genomics, and clinical records, offers a promising approach for this complex task. While recent studies mainly focus on imaging and genomic data, clinical information, which reflecting patients' overall health, remains underutilized due to its discrete, sparse, and low-dimensional characteristics. We propose SurvPGC, an integrated model combining pathology images, genomic data and clinical records for cancer prognosis. Clinical information is transformed into high-dimensional vectors using text templates and foundation models, enabling their integration through a cross-attention module. Validation on three datasets of The Cancer Genome Atlas demonstrated that the model effectively captures modality-specific features, with attention visualization revealing distinct focus areas across data types. This highlights the importance of incorporating diverse information sources for improved survival prediction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [19]Holste, G. et al. End-to-end learning of fused image and non-image features for improved breast cancer classification from MRI. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. 2021, 3287–3296 (2021).
- [21]Radford, A. et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 139, 8748–8763 (2021).
- [33]Klambauer, G. et al.Self-normalizing neural networks, In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems2017, 972–981 (2017).
- [34]Ilse, M., Tomczak, J. M. & Welling, M. Attention-based deep multiple instance learning. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR80, 2127–2136 (2018).
- [35]Shao, Z. et al. TransMIL: transformer based correlated multiple instance learning for whole slide image classification. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 3, 2136–2147 (2021).
- [44]Fan, L., Krishnan, D., Isola, P., Katabi, D. & Tian, Y. Improving CLIP training with language rewrites. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Systems36, 35544-35575 (2023).
- [53]Vaswani, A., et al. Attention is all you need. 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017)30, 5998–6008 (2017).
- Authors
- Hou, J., Zhang, R., Xie, Y., Li, C., & Qin, W.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Qin, Wenjian
- Venue
- npj Digital Medicine
- Published
- 2025-12-27
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-76
- ISSN
- 2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12830675
- OpenAlex
- W7117365250
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38
- FWCI
- 21.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62271475)
- Shenzhen-Hong Kong Joint Lab on Intelligence Computational Analysis for Tumor Imaging (E3G111)
- Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2022365)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- cancer prognosis prediction, survival prediction, multimodal deep learning, clinical data integration, text templates, foundation models, cross-attention, pathology images, genomic data, medical records, tumor heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review