Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 655

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structure of the catalytically active copper–ceria interfacial perimeter

Chen, Aling, Yu, Xiaojuan, Zhou, Yan, Miao, Shu, Li, Yong, Kuld, Sebastian, Sehested, Jens, Liu, Jingyue, Aoki, Toshihiro, Hong, Song, Camellone, Matteo Farnesi, Fabris, Stefano, Ning, Jing, Jin, Chuanchuan, Yang, Chengwu, Nefedov, Alexei, Wöll, Christof, Wang, Yuemin, Shen, Wenjie·2019·Nature Catalysis

Abstract

Cu/CeO2 catalysts are highly active for the low-temperature water–gas shift—a core reaction in syngas chemistry for tuning the H2/CO/CO2 proportions in feed streams—but the direct identification and quantitative description of the active sites remain challenging. Here we report that the active copper clusters consist of a bottom layer of mainly Cu+ atoms bonded on the oxygen vacancies (Ov) of ceria, in a form of Cu+–Ov–Ce3+, and a top layer of Cu0 atoms coordinated with the underlying Cu+ atoms. This atomic structure model is based on directly observing copper clusters dispersed on ceria by a combination of scanning transmission electron microscopy and electron energy loss spectroscopy, in situ probing of the interfacial copper–ceria bonding environment by infrared spectroscopy and rationalization by density functional theory calculations. These results, together with reaction kinetics, reveal that the reaction occurs at the copper–ceria interfacial perimeter via a site cooperation mechanism: the Cu+ site chemically adsorbs CO whereas the neighbouring Ov–Ce3+ site dissociatively activates H2O.Copper on ceria is an excellent catalyst for the low-temperature water–gas shift reaction. Here the active sites are directly imaged by electron microscopy and probed with in situ spectroscopy, showing that the reaction proceeds via a cooperative mechanism whereby the Cu+ chemically adsorbs CO while an adjacent Ov–Ce3+ site dissociatively activates H2O.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41929-019-0226-6

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 655

Metadata

Authors
Chen, A., Yu, X., Zhou, Y., Miao, S., Li, Y., Kuld, S., Sehested, J., Liu, J., Aoki, T., Hong, S., Camellone, M. F., Fabris, S., Ning, J., Jin, C., Yang, C., Nefedov, A., Wöll, C., Wang, Y., & Shen, W.
Venue
Nature Catalysis
Published
2019-02-18
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
334-341
ISSN
2520-1158 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2917488426
Cited by
655
References
0
FWCI
22.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure of the catalytically active copper–ceria interfacial perimeter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41929-019-0226-6
The paper
Chen, A., Yu, X., Zhou, Y., Miao, S., Li, Y., Kuld, S., Sehested, J., Liu, J., Aoki, T., Hong, S., Camellone, M. F., Fabris, S., Ning, J., Jin, C., Yang, C., Nefedov, A., Wöll, C., Wang, Y., & Shen, W. (2019). Structure of the catalytically active copper–ceria interfacial perimeter. Nature Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0226-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.