Cited by 232Protein Degradation and InhibitorsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Extended pharmacodynamic responses observed upon PROTAC-mediated degradation of RIPK2

Open access
Mares, Alina, Miah, Afjal H., Smith, Ian E. D., Rackham, Mark, Thawani, Aditya R., Cryan, Jenni, Haile, Pamela A., Votta, Bartholomew J. +15 more·2020·Communications Biology

Abstract

Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) are heterobifunctional small-molecules that can promote the rapid and selective proteasome-mediated degradation of intracellular proteins through the recruitment of E3 ligase complexes to non-native protein substrates. The catalytic mechanism of action of PROTACs represents an exciting new modality in drug discovery that offers several potential advantages over traditional small-molecule inhibitors, including the potential to deliver pharmacodynamic (PD) efficacy which extends beyond the detectable pharmacokinetic (PK) presence of the PROTAC, driven by the synthesis rate of the protein. Herein we report the identification and development of PROTACs that selectively degrade Receptor-Interacting Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase 2 (RIPK2) and demonstrate in vivo degradation of endogenous RIPK2 in rats at low doses and extended PD that persists in the absence of detectable compound. This disconnect between PK and PD, when coupled with low nanomolar potency, offers the potential for low human doses and infrequent dosing regimens with PROTAC medicines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42003-020-0868-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incorporating a ligand into a PROTAC allows the POI to be degraded without requiring a large excess of drug, resulting in more complete target blockade and a wider therapeutic window.

    “By incorporating the ligand into a PROTAC, which often acts in an iterative or ‘pseudo-catalytic’ fashion by binding and facilitating the interaction of its ligase and POI targets, the POI can be degraded without requiring a large excess of drug, thereby resulting in more complete target blockade and a wider therapeutic window22,48.”

    From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

  • PROTACs targeting TRIM24, RIPK2, and JAK family enzymes may have potential to treat certain types of hematologic malignancies but require further studies.

    “In addition, PROTACs targeting tripartite motif-containing protein 24 (TRIM24), receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 (RIPK2), and the Janus kinase family enzymes for degradation may also have the potential to be used to treat certain types of hematologic malignancies but require further studies [185–187].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 232

Authors
Mares, A., Miah, A. H., Smith, I. E. D., Rackham, M., Thawani, A. R., Cryan, J., Haile, P. A., Votta, B. J., Beal, A. M., Capriotti, C., Reilly, M. A., Fisher, D. T., Zinn, N., Bantscheff, M., MacDonald, T. T., Vossenkamper, A., Dace, P., Churcher, I., Benowitz, A. B., Watt, G., Denyer, J., Scott-Stevens, P., & Harling, J. D.
Affiliations
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (Germany) (DE)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Harling, John D.
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2020-03-20
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
140-140
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012324425
Cited by
232
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 19
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
PROTACs, RIPK2, proteasomal degradation, pharmacodynamic response, E3 ubiquitin ligase, low-dose dosing
MeSH terms
THP-1 Cells, Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Colitis, Ulcerative, Crohn Disease, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Enzyme Stability, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Injections, Intravenous, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Male, Drug Design, Cytokines, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Wistar, Inflammation Mediators, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Tissue Culture Techniques, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Receptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine Kinase 2, Ubiquitination, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review