Classification of likely functional class for ligand binding sites identified from fragment screening
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Fragment screening is used to identify binding sites and leads in drug discovery, but it is often unclear which binding sites are functionally important. Here, data from 37 experiments, and 1309 protein structures binding to 1601 ligands were analysed. A method to group ligands by binding sites is introduced and sites clustered according to profiles of relative solvent accessibility. This identified 293 unique ligand binding sites, grouped into four clusters (C1-4). C1 includes larger, buried, conserved, and population missense-depleted sites, enriched in known functional sites. C4 comprises smaller, accessible, divergent, missense-enriched sites, depleted in functional sites. A site in C1 is 28 times more likely to be functional than one in C4. Seventeen sites, which to the best of our knowledge are novel, in 13 proteins are identified as likely to be functionally important with examples from human tenascin and 5-aminolevulinate synthase highlighted. A multi-layer perceptron, and K -nearest neighbours model are presented to predict cluster labels for ligand binding sites with an accuracy of 96% and 100%, respectively, so allowing functional classification of sites for proteins not in this set. Our findings will be of interest to those studying protein-ligand interactions and developing new drugs or function modulators.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Regulation of 5-aminolevulinate synthase mRNA in different rat tissues.
Srivastava, G., Borthwick, I. A., Maguire, D. J., Elferink, C. J., Bawden, M. J., Mercer, J. F., & May, B. K. (1988) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)60700-8 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
MacGowan, S. A., Madeira, F., Britto-Borges, T., & Barton, G. J. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06117-5 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MacGowan, S. A., Madeira, F., Britto-Borges, T., & Barton, G. J. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06117-5 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Utgés, J. S., MacGowan, S. A., Ives, C. M., & Barton, G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Dundee (GB)
- National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Barton, Geoffrey J.
- Venue
- Communications Biology
- Published
- 2024-03-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 320-320
- ISSN
- 2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10937669
- OpenAlex
- W4392746709
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J019364/1, BB/R014752/1, BB/J01446X/1)
- Wellcome Trust (101651/Z/13/Z, 218259/Z/19/Z)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- ligand binding sites, fragment screening, binding site clustering, missense mutations, protein-ligand interactions, tenascin, 5-aminolevulinate synthase, binding site prediction, drug discovery
- MeSH terms
- Binding Sites, Humans, Ligands, Proteins, Drug Discovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review