A multi-ancestry GWAS of Fuchs corneal dystrophy highlights the contributions of laminins, collagen, and endothelial cell regulation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is a leading indication for corneal transplantation, but its molecular etiology remains poorly understood. We performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of FECD in the Million Veteran Program followed by multi-ancestry meta-analysis with the previous largest FECD GWAS, for a total of 3970 cases and 333,794 controls. We confirm the previous four loci, and identify eight novel loci: SSBP3 , THSD7A , LAMB1 , PIDD1 , RORA , HS3ST3B1 , LAMA5 , and COL18A1 . We further confirm the TCF4 locus in GWAS for admixed African and Hispanic/Latino ancestries and show an enrichment of European-ancestry haplotypes at TCF4 in FECD cases. Among the novel associations are low frequency missense variants in laminin genes LAMA5 and LAMB1 which, together with previously reported LAMC1 , form laminin-511 (LM511). AlphaFold 2 protein modeling, validated through homology, suggests that mutations at LAMA5 and LAMB1 may destabilize LM511 by altering inter-domain interactions or extracellular matrix binding. Finally, phenome-wide association scans and colocalization analyses suggest that the TCF4 CTG18.1 trinucleotide repeat expansion leads to dysregulation of ion transport in the corneal endothelium and has pleiotropic effects on renal function.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Giambartolomei, C., Vukcevic, D., Schadt, E. E., Franke, L., Hingorani, A. D., Wallace, C., & Plagnol, V. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004383 · Cited by 4,261 · see citing works
Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) Consortium, Yang, J., DIAbetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis (DIAGRAM) Consortium, Ferreira, T., Morris, A. P., Medland, S. E., Madden, P. A. F., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., Montgomery, G. W., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2213 · Cited by 1,712 · see citing works
Fine-mapping from summary data with the “Sum of Single Effects” model
Zou, Y., Carbonetto, P., Wang, G., & Stephens, M. (2022) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010299 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Gorman, B. R., Francis, M., Nealon, C. L., Halladay, C. W., Duro, N., Markianos, K., Genovese, G., Hysi, P. G., Choquet, H., Afshari, N. A., Li, Y.-J., Program, V. M. V., Tsao, P. S., Gaziano, J. M., Hung, A. M., Wu, W.-C., Greenberg, P. B., Pyarajan, S., Lass, J. H., Peachey, N. S., & Iyengar, S. K.
- Affiliations
- Booz Allen Hamilton (United States) (US)
- VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System (US)
- Providence VA Medical Center (US)
- VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- King's College London (GB)
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Duke University (US)
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Peachey, Neal S.
- Iyengar, Sudha K.
- ORCID
- Gorman, Bryan R.
- Francis, Michael
- Nealon, Cari L.
- Halladay, Christopher W.
- Markianos, Kyriacos
- Genovese, Giulio
- Hysi, Pirro G.
- Choquet, Hélène
- Afshari, Natalie A.
- Li, Yi-Ju
- Tsao, Philip S.
- Gaziano, J. Michael
- Hung, Adriana M.
- Wu, Wen-Chih
- Greenberg, Paul B.
- Pyarajan, Saiju
- Lass, Jonathan H.
- Peachey, Neal S.
- Iyengar, Sudha K.
- Venue
- Communications Biology
- Published
- 2024-04-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 418-418
- ISSN
- 2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10998918
- OpenAlex
- W4394013886
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development, VA Office of Research and Development (I01 BX003364, IK6 BX005233)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Ocular Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, laminin-511, LAMA5, LAMB1, LAMC1, TCF4, corneal endothelium, collagen, THSD7A, RORA, COL18A1, novel genetic loci, Million Veteran Program, phenome-wide association study, colocalization, missense mutations, extracellular matrix, renal function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review