Evolution of iGluR ligand specificity, polyamine regulation, and ion selectivity inferred from a placozoan epsilon receptor
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Epsilon ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are a recently defined clade of neurotransmitter receptors that are found in all major metazoan lineages that are distinct from α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA), kainate, delta, phi (i.e., AKDF) and N -methyl-D-aspartate NMDA receptors. Here, we explore the evolution of iGluRs by generating a broad species-guided phylogeny of eukaryotic iGluRs and a comprehensive phylogeny of placozoan receptors, uncovering marked diversification of epsilon type receptors within Placozoa. Functional characterization of one epsilon receptor from the placozoan species Trichoplax adhaerens , named GluE1αA, reveals sensitivity to glycine, alanine, serine, and valine, but not glutamate. We demonstrate that changing just three amino acids in the ligand binding domain could convert ligand specificity of GluE1αA from glycine to glutamate, also causing nascent sensitivity to AMPA and increased sensitivity to the blocker 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX). We also demonstrate that an atypical serine in the pore Q/R/N site confers diminished Ca 2+ permeation and sensitivity to polyamine block, imposing similar effects on the human GluA2 receptor, and that a conserved aspartate four amino acids downstream of the Q/R/N site is crucial for polyamine regulation. Thus, key molecular determinants for polyamine regulation are conserved between AKDF and epsilon receptors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Togaininsightsintowhytheseaminoacidchangesresultedinaligand speci fi cityswitch,wepredictedthestructureofGluE1 α AwithAlphaFold 38,39 and conducted docking of glycine and glutamate to the ligand binding pocket of the wildtype and m3 receptor variants.”
Stargazin regulates synaptic targeting of AMPA receptors by two distinct mechanisms
Chen, L., Chetkovich, D. M., Petralia, R. S., Sweeney, N. T., Kawasaki, Y., Wenthold, R. J., Bredt, D. S., & Nicoll, R. A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35050030 · Cited by 1,111 · see citing works
Neurodegeneration in Lurcher mice caused by mutation in δ2 glutamate receptor gene
Zuo, J., De Jager, P. L., Takahashi, K. A., Jiang, W., Linden, D. J., & Heintz, N. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42009 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Ruthmann, A., Behrendt, G., & Wahl, R. (1986) · Zoomorphology · doi:10.1007/bf00312113 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Singh, A., Zhorov, B. S., Yanez-Guerra, L. A., Aleotti, A., Koens, C. C., Yanartas, C. D., Song, Y., Miguez Cabello, F. J., Bowie, D., & Senatore, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Senatore, Adriano
- ORCID
- Venue
- Communications Biology
- Published
- 2025-07-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 994-994
- ISSN
- 2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12226733
- OpenAlex
- W4411983781
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2021-03557, RGPAS-2021-00002)
- Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science (ER17-13-247)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Keywords
- placozoans, Trichoplax adhaerens, ligand specificity, polyamine regulation, ion selectivity, receptor evolution, phylogeny, ligand-binding domain, glutamate sensitivity, CNQX, calcium permeation, GluA2
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Ligands, Phylogeny, Polyamines, Evolution, Molecular, Placozoa, Receptors, Ionotropic Glutamate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review