BiRNA-BERT allows efficient RNA language modeling with adaptive tokenization
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Transformer-based models have achieved remarkable success in biological sequence modeling, yet their application to RNA remains constrained by sequence length limitations. Existing RNA language models often truncate inputs, discarding distal nucleotide context crucial for full-length tasks. Additionally, advanced NLP tokenization methods do not directly apply to biological sequences, where nucleotide-level resolution is essential for tasks like secondary structure prediction. To address these challenges, we introduce BiRNA-BERT, a 117M-parameter Transformer encoder trained on 36 million non-coding RNA sequences. At its core is an adaptive dual-tokenization framework that combines nucleotide-level (NUC) encoding for fine-grained structural tasks with byte-pair encoding (BPE) for efficient long-sequence processing. BiRNA-BERT dynamically selects tokenization based on input length, enabling it to process arbitrarily long sequences without truncation. We demonstrate state-of-the-art performance across tasks ranging from short-sequence classification to long-context modeling and fine-grained nucleotide level RNA structural prediction. Our information-theoretic analysis reveals the trade-offs between BPE compression and NUC tokenization, which we again validate empirically. Finally, BiRNA-BERT achieves strong intrinsic language modeling performance–measured by perplexity and token recovery–while remaining more compact than existing RNA models. The code and model weights are available at https://github.com/buetnlpbio/BiRNA-BERT .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 45 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Tahmid, M. T., Shahgir, H. S., Mahbub, S., Dong, Y., & Bayzid, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BD)
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bayzid, Md Shamsuzzoha
- Venue
- Communications Biology
- Published
- 2025-11-20
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1621-1621
- ISSN
- 2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12635123
- OpenAlex
- W4416414445
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Basic Research Grant at Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- byte pair encoding, long sequence modeling, non-coding RNA, RNA secondary structure prediction, information-theoretic analysis, perplexity
- MeSH terms
- Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Software, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review