Cited by 5RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein Structure and DynamicsRNA modifications and cancer

Quality assessment of RNA 3D structure models using deep learning and intermediate 2D maps

Open access
Liu, Xiaocheng, Wang, Wenkai, Du, Zongyang, Wang, Ziyi, Peng, Zhenling, Yang, Jianyi·2026·Communications Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Accurate quality assessment is critical for computational prediction and design of RNA three-dimensional (3D) structures, yet it remains a significant challenge. In this work, we introduce RNArank, a deep learning-based approach to both local and global quality assessment of predicted RNA 3D structure models. For a given structure model, RNArank extracts a comprehensive set of multi-modal features and processes them with a Y-shaped residual neural network. This network is trained to predict two intermediate 2D maps, including the inter-nucleotide contact map and the distance deviation map. These maps are then used to estimate the local and global accuracy. Extensive benchmark tests indicate that RNArank consistently outperforms traditional methods and other deep learning-based methods. Moreover, RNArank demonstrates promising performance in identifying high-quality structure models for targets from the recent CASP15 and CASP16 experiments. We anticipate that RNArank will serve as a valuable tool for the RNA biology community, improving the reliability of RNA structure modeling and thereby contributing to a deeper understanding of RNA function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42003-026-09582-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Liu, X., Wang, W., Du, Z., Wang, Z., Peng, Z., & Yang, J.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Wenkai
  • Yang, Jianyi
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2026-01-21
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7125404175
Cited by
5
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (T2225007, 32430063, 62402075, T2222012)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (BX20240212, 2025M783122)
  • Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (KJQN202300639)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
RNA 3D structure prediction, deep learning, ResNet, CASP15, CASP16
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Models, Molecular, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review