Cited by 0Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsCell Image Analysis Techniques

High-resolution mri guided whole mouse brain neuronal cell type atlas using deep learning

Open access
Han, Xinyue, Hu, Rui, Liu, Zhuoheng, Chen, Jie, Jafry, Mubashir, Song, Haoyu, Zhao, Yi, Lin, Mingquan +3 more·2026·Communications Biology

Abstract

Cell types represent groups of cells with shared anatomical and functional properties. Traditional brain cell type atlases rely on single-cell sequencing, which provides molecular detail but lacks whole-brain, isotropic resolution. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) offers a complementary approach for probing cytoarchitecture and myeloarchitecture, with quantitative metrics increasingly used as biomarkers of brain development and neurodegenerative disorders. However, the capacity of dMRI to predict cell types remains unclear. Here, we develop a multimodal framework by integrating high-resolution dMRI and three-dimensional light-sheet microscopy of adult mouse brains through registration to the Allen Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework. We investigate correlations between dMRI and spatial transcriptomics-derived cell types and generate a whole-brain neuronal cell type atlas at 10 µm isotropic resolution using deep learning. Together, these results establish an efficient, high-resolution strategy for brain neuron atlas generation and underscore the potential of advanced imaging techniques to illuminate cellular mechanisms of the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42003-026-10608-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural networks may be able to estimate spatial distributions of neuronal and glial cell types in neurodegenerative disease.

    “Compared with deep learning approaches focused on healthy brains, 89 our results provide preliminary evidence that neural networks may be able to estimate spatial distributions of neuronal and glial cell types in neurodegenerative disease.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Authors
Han, X., Hu, R., Liu, Z., Chen, J., Jafry, M., Song, H., Zhao, Y., Lin, M., White, L. E., Johnson, G. A., & Wang, N.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Missouri Southern State University (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Nian
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2026-07-07
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7167581199
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (R01NS125020, P41EB015897, S10OD010683)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
diffusion MRI, mouse brain, light-sheet microscopy, multimodal image registration, spatial transcriptomics, deep learning, brain cytoarchitecture, myeloarchitecture, isotropic resolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review