High-resolution mri guided whole mouse brain neuronal cell type atlas using deep learning
Open accessAbstract
Cell types represent groups of cells with shared anatomical and functional properties. Traditional brain cell type atlases rely on single-cell sequencing, which provides molecular detail but lacks whole-brain, isotropic resolution. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) offers a complementary approach for probing cytoarchitecture and myeloarchitecture, with quantitative metrics increasingly used as biomarkers of brain development and neurodegenerative disorders. However, the capacity of dMRI to predict cell types remains unclear. Here, we develop a multimodal framework by integrating high-resolution dMRI and three-dimensional light-sheet microscopy of adult mouse brains through registration to the Allen Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework. We investigate correlations between dMRI and spatial transcriptomics-derived cell types and generate a whole-brain neuronal cell type atlas at 10 µm isotropic resolution using deep learning. Together, these results establish an efficient, high-resolution strategy for brain neuron atlas generation and underscore the potential of advanced imaging techniques to illuminate cellular mechanisms of the brain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neural networks may be able to estimate spatial distributions of neuronal and glial cell types in neurodegenerative disease.
“Compared with deep learning approaches focused on healthy brains, 89 our results provide preliminary evidence that neural networks may be able to estimate spatial distributions of neuronal and glial cell types in neurodegenerative disease.”
From Diffusion MRI reveals amyloid plaque–associated cellular signatures through spatial transcriptomic integration (2026) · cites this paper as [89]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
- Authors
- Han, X., Hu, R., Liu, Z., Chen, J., Jafry, M., Song, H., Zhao, Y., Lin, M., White, L. E., Johnson, G. A., & Wang, N.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Missouri Southern State University (US)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Nian
- ORCID
- Venue
- Communications Biology
- Published
- 2026-07-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7167581199
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (R01NS125020, P41EB015897, S10OD010683)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- diffusion MRI, mouse brain, light-sheet microscopy, multimodal image registration, spatial transcriptomics, deep learning, brain cytoarchitecture, myeloarchitecture, isotropic resolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review