Cited by 24Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

A mutation-induced drug resistance database (MdrDB)

Open access
Yang, Ziyi, Ye, Zhaofeng, Qiu, Jiezhong, Feng, Rongjun, Li, Danyu, Hsieh, Changyu, Allcock, Jonathan, Zhang, Shengyu·2023·Communications Chemistry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Mutation-induced drug resistance is a significant challenge to the clinical treatment of many diseases, as structural changes in proteins can diminish drug efficacy. Understanding how mutations affect protein-ligand binding affinities is crucial for developing new drugs and therapies. However, the lack of a large-scale and high-quality database has hindered the research progresses in this area. To address this issue, we have developed MdrDB, a database that integrates data from seven publicly available datasets, which is the largest database of its kind. By integrating information on drug sensitivity and cell line mutations from Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer and DepMap, MdrDB has substantially expanded the existing drug resistance data. MdrDB is comprised of 100,537 samples of 240 proteins (which encompass 5119 total PDB structures), 2503 mutations, and 440 drugs. Each sample brings together 3D structures of wild type and mutant protein-ligand complexes, binding affinity changes upon mutation (ΔΔG), and biochemical features. Experimental results with MdrDB demonstrate its effectiveness in significantly enhancing the performance of commonly used machine learning models when predicting ΔΔG in three standard benchmarking scenarios. In conclusion, MdrDB is a comprehensive database that can advance the understanding of mutation-induced drug resistance, and accelerate the discovery of novel chemicals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42004-023-00920-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Yang, Z., Ye, Z., Qiu, J., Feng, R., Li, D., Hsieh, C., Allcock, J., & Zhang, S.
Affiliations
Tencent (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Shengyu
Venue
Communications Chemistry
Published
2023-06-14
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
123-123
ISSN
2399-3669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380683039
Cited by
24
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Tencent
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
protein-ligand binding affinity, point mutations, protein-ligand complex, drug sensitivity, cancer cell lines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review