Multimodal deep learning integration of cryo-EM and AlphaFold3 for high-accuracy protein structure determination
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is a key technology for determining the structures of proteins, particularly large protein complexes. However, automatically building high-accuracy protein structures from cryo-EM density maps remains a crucial challenge. In this work, we introduce MICA, a fully automatic and multimodal deep learning approach combining cryo-EM density maps with AlphaFold3-predicted structures at both input and output levels to improve cryo-EM protein structure modeling. It first uses a multi-task encoder-decoder architecture with a feature pyramid network to predict backbone atoms, Cα atoms, and amino acid types from both cryo-EM maps and AlphaFold3-predicted structures, which are used to build an initial backbone model. This model is further refined using AlphaFold3-predicted structures and density maps to build final atomic structures. MICA significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art deep learning methods in terms of both modeling accuracy and completeness, and is robust to protein size and map resolution. Additionally, it builds high-accuracy structural models with an average template-based modeling score (TM-score) of 0.93 from recently released high-resolution cryo-EM density maps, showing it can be used for real-world, automated, accurate protein structure determination.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The input for MICA is the multimodal data of a protein consisting of a cryo-EM density map and AF3-predicted structures 25 of its chains along with their amino acid sequences (Fig.”
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Automated model building and protein identification in cryo-EM maps
Jamali, K., Käll, L., Zhang, R., Brown, A., Kimanius, D., & Scheres, S. H. W. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.16.541002 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Giri, N., Roy, R. S., & Cheng, J. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102536 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Gyawali, R., Dhakal, A., & Cheng, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cheng, Jianlin
- Venue
- Communications Chemistry
- Published
- 2025-10-31
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 320-320
- ISSN
- 2399-3669 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12579259
- OpenAlex
- W4415735075
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (R01GM146340)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- cryo-EM density maps, protein structure determination, AlphaFold3, multimodal deep learning, feature pyramid network, encoder-decoder architecture, template-based modeling, mica
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review