Cited by 10Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and Function

Multimodal deep learning integration of cryo-EM and AlphaFold3 for high-accuracy protein structure determination

Open access
Gyawali, Rajan, Dhakal, Ashwin, Cheng, Jianlin·2025·Communications Chemistry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is a key technology for determining the structures of proteins, particularly large protein complexes. However, automatically building high-accuracy protein structures from cryo-EM density maps remains a crucial challenge. In this work, we introduce MICA, a fully automatic and multimodal deep learning approach combining cryo-EM density maps with AlphaFold3-predicted structures at both input and output levels to improve cryo-EM protein structure modeling. It first uses a multi-task encoder-decoder architecture with a feature pyramid network to predict backbone atoms, Cα atoms, and amino acid types from both cryo-EM maps and AlphaFold3-predicted structures, which are used to build an initial backbone model. This model is further refined using AlphaFold3-predicted structures and density maps to build final atomic structures. MICA significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art deep learning methods in terms of both modeling accuracy and completeness, and is robust to protein size and map resolution. Additionally, it builds high-accuracy structural models with an average template-based modeling score (TM-score) of 0.93 from recently released high-resolution cryo-EM density maps, showing it can be used for real-world, automated, accurate protein structure determination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42004-025-01718-5

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Gyawali, R., Dhakal, A., & Cheng, J.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Jianlin
Venue
Communications Chemistry
Published
2025-10-31
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
320-320
ISSN
2399-3669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415735075
Cited by
10
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (R01GM146340)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
cryo-EM density maps, protein structure determination, AlphaFold3, multimodal deep learning, feature pyramid network, encoder-decoder architecture, template-based modeling, mica

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review