Cited by 2Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerEnzyme Structure and FunctionReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Structural basis for Porcupine inhibition

Open access
Black, Katrina A., Mobbs, Jesse I., Venugopal, Hariprasad, Dite, Toby A., Leis, Andrew, Wong, Lilian LL, Dagley, Laura F., Thal, David M. +1 more·2025·Communications Chemistry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Wnt signalling is essential for embryonic development and tissue homeostasis, and its dysregulation is associated with multiple types of cancer. Porcupine (PORCN), an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident membrane-bound O-acyltransferase, catalyses the palmitoylation of all 19 human Wnts—a critical modification required for their secretion and activity. This central role makes PORCN an attractive therapeutic target for Wnt-driven cancers, with several inhibitors currently in clinical trials. Here, we present high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structures of human PORCN in complex with the inhibitors C59 (2.4 Å) and ETC159 (2.6 Å), as well as in a ligand-free state (3.3 Å). These structures reveal critical ordered water molecules that form a hydrogen-bonding network within the active site, mediating inhibitor binding. Our docking simulations of diverse PORCN inhibitors demonstrate that despite their different chemical scaffolds, these compounds adopt similar conformations within the acyl-CoA binding site and are also engaged through a conserved water molecule. Our findings provide a structural foundation for the rational design of next-generation PORCN inhibitors with improved pharmacological properties for cancer therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42004-025-01726-5

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Black, K. A., Mobbs, J. I., Venugopal, H., Dite, T. A., Leis, A., Wong, L. L., Dagley, L. F., Thal, D. M., & Glukhova, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Glukhova, Alisa
Venue
Communications Chemistry
Published
2025-11-12
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
348-348
ISSN
2399-3669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416142741
Cited by
2
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Monash University
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1196951)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
Wnt signaling, O-acyltransferase, hydrogen bond network, ordered water molecules, inhibitor binding, rational drug design, protein structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review