Cited by 1Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

Generalizable compound protein interaction prediction with a model incorporating protein structure aware and compound property aware language model representations

Open access
Zhang, Yiming, Ishitani, Ryuichiro, Takemoto, Mizuki, Tomita, Atsuhiro·2025·Communications Chemistry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Compound–protein interaction (CPI) prediction plays a crucial role in drug discovery by aiding the identification of binding and affinities between small molecules and proteins. Current deep learning models rely heavily on sequence-based representations and suffer from a lack of labeled data, which restricts their accuracy and generalizability. To overcome these challenges, we propose GenSPARC (a model with Gen eralized S tructure- and P roperty- A ware R epresentations of protein and chemical language models for C PI prediction), a deep learning model that leverages structure-aware protein representations derived from AlphaFold2 predictions and FoldSeek’s three-dimensional interaction alphabet. Compound features were extracted using graph convolutional networks and a pretrained chemical language model, thereby ensuring comprehensive multimodal representation. An attention mechanism further enhanced interaction modeling by capturing intricate binding patterns. GenSPARC was validated successfully with multiple CPI benchmark datasets, demonstrating strong generalizability across challenging data splits and competitive results in virtual screening tasks. Therefore, GenSPARC will substantially advance artificial intelligence-driven drug discovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42004-025-01844-0

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Ishitani, R., Takemoto, M., & Tomita, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Science Tokyo (JP)
  • Preferred Networks (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Tomita, Atsuhiro
Venue
Communications Chemistry
Published
2025-12-19
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
37-37
ISSN
2399-3669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417479088
Cited by
1
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
compound-protein interaction prediction, protein-ligand binding affinity, chemical language models, AlphaFold2, graph convolutional networks, multimodal representation, attention mechanism, virtual screening, drug discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review