The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding key players in complex networks through deep reinforcement learning
Open accessAbstract
Finding an optimal set of nodes, called key players, whose activation (or removal) would maximally enhance (or degrade) a certain network functionality, is a fundamental class of problems in network science. Potential applications include network immunization, epidemic control, drug design and viral marketing. Due to their general NP-hard nature, these problems typically cannot be solved by exact algorithms with polynomial time complexity. Many approximate and heuristic strategies have been proposed to deal with specific application scenarios. Yet, we still lack a unified framework to efficiently solve this class of problems. Here, we introduce a deep reinforcement learning framework FINDER, which can be trained purely on small synthetic networks generated by toy models and then applied to a wide spectrum of application scenarios. Extensive experiments under various problem settings demonstrate that FINDER significantly outperforms existing methods in terms of solution quality. Moreover, it is several orders of magnitude faster than existing methods for large networks. The presented framework opens up a new direction of using deep learning techniques to understand the organizing principle of complex networks, which enables us to design more robust networks against both attacks and failures. A fundamental problem in network science is how to find an optimal set of key players whose activation or removal significantly impacts network functionality. The authors propose a deep reinforcement learning framework that can be trained on small networks to understand the organizing principles of complex networked systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks
Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.02907 · Cited by 24,853
Statistical mechanics of complex networks
Albert, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.47 · Cited by 20,471
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450342480 · Cited by 18,719
Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs
Hamilton, W. L., Ying, R., & Leskovec, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02216 · Cited by 10,639
Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge
Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24270 · Cited by 9,084
Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network
Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., & Tardos, É. (2003) · Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/956750.956769 · Cited by 7,326
Epidemic Spreading in Scale-Free Networks
Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.3200 · Cited by 5,731
Erdős, P., & Rényi, A. (2022) · Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen · doi:10.5486/pmd.1959.6.3-4.12 · Cited by 5,337
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, C., Zeng, L., Sun, Y., & Liu, Y.-Y.
- Venue
- Nature Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2020-05-25
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 317-324
- ISSN
- 2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3028110392
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finding key players in complex networks through deep reinforcement learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s42256-020-0177-2
- The paper
- Fan, C., Zeng, L., Sun, Y., & Liu, Y.-Y. (2020). Finding key players in complex networks through deep reinforcement learning. Nature Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0177-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.