Cited by 152Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A versatile deep learning architecture for classification and label-free prediction of hyperspectral images

Open access
Manifold, Bryce, Men, Shuaiqian, Hu, Ruoqian, Fu, Dan·2021·Nature Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Hyperspectral imaging is a technique that provides rich chemical or compositional information not regularly available to traditional imaging modalities such as intensity imaging or color imaging based on the reflection, transmission, or emission of light. Analysis of hyperspectral imaging often relies on machine learning methods to extract information. Here, we present a new flexible architecture, the U-within-U-Net, that can perform classification, segmentation, and prediction of orthogonal imaging modalities on a variety of hyperspectral imaging techniques. Specifically, we demonstrate feature segmentation and classification on the Indian Pines hyperspectral dataset and simultaneous location prediction of multiple drugs in mass spectrometry imaging of rat liver tissue. We further demonstrate label-free fluorescence image prediction from hyperspectral stimulated Raman scattering microscopy images. The applicability of the U-within-U-Net architecture on diverse datasets with widely varying input and output dimensions and data sources suggest that it has great potential in advancing the use of hyperspectral imaging across many different application areas ranging from remote sensing, to medical imaging, to microscopy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-021-00309-y

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cheng, J.-X. & Xie, X. S. Coherent Raman Scattering Microscopy (CRC Press, 2013).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Manifold, B., Men, S., Hu, R., & Fu, D.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Manifold, Bryce
  • Fu, Dan
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2021-03-11
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
306-315
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134761005
Cited by
152
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 8
FWCI
10.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Beckman Young Investigator Award
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
hyperspectral imaging, U-Net architecture, image classification, image segmentation, mass spectrometry imaging, stimulated Raman scattering microscopy, Indian Pines dataset, rat liver tissue, remote sensing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review