Cited by 55Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesAI in cancer detectionMachine Learning in Healthcare

Machine learning to guide the use of adjuvant therapies for breast cancer

Open access
Alaa, Ahmed M., Gurdasani, Deepti, Harris, Adrian L., Rashbass, Jem, van der Schaar, Mihaela·2021·Nature Machine Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-021-00353-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study investigating survival benefits of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer evaluated ML models originally developed using UK populations in US clinical settings.

    “For external validation of therapeutic ML models, a pertinent reference is a study investigating the survival benefits of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer where researchers evaluated ML models, which were originally developed using populations from the United Kingdom, in clinical settings in the United States [11].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 55

Authors
Alaa, A. M., Gurdasani, D., Harris, A. L., Rashbass, J., & van der Schaar, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Public Health England (GB)
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2021-06-24
Volume
3
Issue
8
Pages
716-726
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3114973470
Cited by
55
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Cambridge
  • University of Oxford
  • Medical Research Council (MR/S003711/1, MR/S003711/2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
breast cancer, adjuvant therapy, treatment response prediction, outcome prediction, early invasive breast cancer, model interpretability, clinical decision support, survival prediction, risk factors, external validation, cancer registry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review