Machine learning to guide the use of adjuvant therapies for breast cancer
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study investigating survival benefits of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer evaluated ML models originally developed using UK populations in US clinical settings.
“For external validation of therapeutic ML models, a pertinent reference is a study investigating the survival benefits of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer where researchers evaluated ML models, which were originally developed using populations from the United Kingdom, in clinical settings in the United States [11].”
From Toward real‐world deployment of machine learning for health care: External validation, continual monitoring, and randomized clinical trials (2024) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 55
- Authors
- Alaa, A. M., Gurdasani, D., Harris, A. L., Rashbass, J., & van der Schaar, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Public Health England (GB)
- Venue
- Nature Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2021-06-24
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 716-726
- ISSN
- 2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3114973470
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Cambridge
- University of Oxford
- Medical Research Council (MR/S003711/1, MR/S003711/2)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- breast cancer, adjuvant therapy, treatment response prediction, outcome prediction, early invasive breast cancer, model interpretability, clinical decision support, survival prediction, risk factors, external validation, cancer registry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review