CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modelling
Open accessAbstract
Large-scale simulations with complex electron interactions remain one of the greatest challenges for atomistic modelling. Although classical force fields often fail to describe the coupling between electronic states and ionic rearrangements, the more accurate ab initio molecular dynamics suffers from computational complexity that prevents long-time and large-scale simulations, which are essential to study technologically relevant phenomena. Here we present the Crystal Hamiltonian Graph Neural Network (CHGNet), a graph neural network-based machine-learning interatomic potential (MLIP) that models the universal potential energy surface. CHGNet is pretrained on the energies, forces, stresses and magnetic moments from the Materials Project Trajectory Dataset, which consists of over 10 years of density functional theory calculations of more than 1.5 million inorganic structures. The explicit inclusion of magnetic moments enables CHGNet to learn and accurately represent the orbital occupancy of electrons, enhancing its capability to describe both atomic and electronic degrees of freedom. We demonstrate several applications of CHGNet in solid-state materials, including charge-informed molecular dynamics in Li x MnO 2 , the finite temperature phase diagram for Li x FePO 4 and Li diffusion in garnet conductors. We highlight the significance of charge information for capturing appropriate chemistry and provide insights into ionic systems with additional electronic degrees of freedom that cannot be observed by previous MLIPs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The crystal structure discovery experiment began with an initial population of 100 groups of parents (200 parent structures) randomly seeded from a reference pool of 5,000 known stable structures from MatBench-bandgapt.
“Each experiment began with an initial population of 100 groups of parents ( 100 × 2 = 200 parent structures), randomly seeded from the reference pool, which is composed with 5,000 known stable structures from MatBench-bandgapt [103] dataset with lowest deformation energy evaluated by CHGNet [104].”
From Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [104]
Universal MLPs are commonly trained on datasets comprising only close-to-equilibrium structures, so caution is needed when applying them to activated events.
“Also, commonly, the universal MLPs are trained on datasets comprising only close-to-equilibrium structures25,27–29, hence caution is needed when applying them to activated events.”
From A reactive neural network framework for water-loaded acidic zeolites (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Universal MLPs cover large parts of the chemical space with dozens of elements but have limited coverage of the configuration space, e.g., not considering all relevant chemical reactions with associated transition states.
“Two paradigms dominate the MLP field currently: (i) training of universal MLP that cover large parts of the chemical space with dozens of elements, but with limited coverage of the configuration space, e.g., not considering all relevant chemical reactions with the associated transition states, e.g., OC22, CHGNet, and others25–29”
From A reactive neural network framework for water-loaded acidic zeolites (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824 · see citing works
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307 · see citing works
Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation
Jain, A., Ong, S. P., Hautier, G., Chen, W., Richards, W. D., Dacek, S., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Skinner, D., Ceder, G., et al. (2013) · APL Materials · doi:10.1063/1.4812323 · Cited by 13,094 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DPA-2: a large atomic model as a multi-task learner
Zhang, D., Liu, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, C., Cai, C., Bi, H., Du, Y., Qin, X., Peng, A., Huang, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.15492 · Cited by 155
Artificial intelligence-driven approaches for materials design and discovery
Cheng, M., Fu, C.-L., Okabe, R., Chotrattanapituk, A., Boonkird, A., Hung, N. T., & Li, M. (2026) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-025-02403-7 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
A reactive neural network framework for water-loaded acidic zeolites
Erlebach, A., Šípka, M., Saha, I., Nachtigall, P., Heard, C. J., & Grajciar, L. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48609-2 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“Also, commonly,theuniversalMLPsaretrainedondatasetscomprisingonly close-to-equilibrium structures 25,27 – 29 , hence caution is needed when applying them to activated events.”
BackgroundVASPilot: MCP-facilitated multi-agent intelligence for autonomous VASP simulations
Liu 刘, J. 家., Zhu 朱, T. 天., Ye 叶, C. 财., Fang 方, Z. 忠., Weng 翁, H. 红., & Wu 吴, Q. 泉. (2025) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ae0681 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery
Song, Z., Lu, J., Du, Y., Yu, B., Pruyn, T. M., Huang, Y., Guo, K., Luo, X., Qu, Y., Qu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Deng, B., Zhong, P., Jun, K., Riebesell, J., Han, K., Bartel, C. J., & Ceder, G.
- Affiliations
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Nature Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2023-09-14
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1031-1041
- ISSN
- 2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386740800
- Cited by
- 944
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 378 · 2025: 390 · 2024: 167 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 69.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1053575)
- U.S. Department of Energy (KC23MP, DE AC02 05CH11231)
- National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (DE–AC02–05CH11231)
- Office of Science (DEAC02–05CH11231)
- Basic Energy Sciences (DE-AC02-05CH11231., KC23MP)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Keywords
- CHGNet, graph neural networks, machine learning interatomic potentials, magnetic moment, orbital occupancy, density functional theory, ab initio molecular dynamics, solid-state materials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review