Cited by 56Micro and Nano RoboticsReinforcement Learning in RoboticsSoft Robotics and Applications

Model-based reinforcement learning for ultrasound-driven autonomous microrobots

Open access
Medany, Mahmoud, Piglia, Lorenzo, Achenbach, Liam, Mukkavilli, S. Karthik, Ahmed, Daniel·2025·Nature Machine Intelligence

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Reinforcement learning is emerging as a powerful tool for microrobots control, as it enables autonomous navigation in environments where classical control approaches fall short. However, applying reinforcement learning to microrobotics is difficult due to the need for large training datasets, the slow convergence in physical systems and poor generalizability across environments. These challenges are amplified in ultrasound-actuated microrobots, which require rapid, precise adjustments in high-dimensional action space, which are often too complex for human operators. Addressing these challenges requires sample-efficient algorithms that adapt from limited data while managing complex physical interactions. To meet these challenges, we implemented model-based reinforcement learning for autonomous control of an ultrasound-driven microrobot, which learns from recurrent imagined environments. Our non-invasive, AI-controlled microrobot offers precise propulsion and efficiently learns from images in data-scarce environments. On transitioning from a pretrained simulation environment, we achieved sample-efficient collision avoidance and channel navigation, reaching a 90% success rate in target navigation across various channels within an hour of fine-tuning. Moreover, our model initially generalized successfully in 50% of tasks in new environments, improving to over 90% with 30 min of further training. We further demonstrated real-time manipulation of microrobots in complex vasculatures under both static and flow conditions, thus underscoring the potential of AI to revolutionize microrobotics in biomedical applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-025-01054-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 56

Authors
Medany, M., Piglia, L., Achenbach, L., Mukkavilli, S. K., & Ahmed, D.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • IBM Research - Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Ahmed, Daniel
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2025-06-26
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
1076-1090
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411668692
Cited by
56
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
17.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Micro and Nano Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
model-based reinforcement learning, sample efficiency, collision avoidance, channel navigation, fine-tuning, generalization across environments, image-based learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review