Cited by 58Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactMeat and Animal Product Quality

Empirical economic analysis shows cost-effective continuous manufacturing of cultivated chicken using animal-free medium

Pasitka, Laura, Wissotsky, Guy, Ayyash, Muneef, Yarza, Nir, Rosoff, Gal, Kaminker, Revital, Nahmias, Yaakov·2024·Nature Food

Abstract

Cellular agriculture aims to meet the growing demand for animal products. However, current production technologies result in low yields, leading to economic projections that prohibit cultivated meat scalability. Here we use tangential flow filtration for continuous manufacturing of cultivated meat to produce biomass of up to 130 × 10 6 cells per ml, corresponding to yields of 43% w/v and multiple harvests for over 20 days. Continuous manufacturing was carried out in an animal-component-free culture medium for US$0.63 l-1 that supports the long-term, high density culture of chicken cells. Using this empirical data, we conducted a techno-economic analysis for a theoretical production facility of 50,000 l, showing that the cost of cultivated chicken can drop to within the range of organic chicken at US$6.2 lb-1 by using perfusion technology. Whereas other variables would also affect actual market prices, continuous manufacturing can offer cost reductions for scaling up cultivated meat production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43016-024-01022-w

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Pasitka, L., Wissotsky, G., Ayyash, M., Yarza, N., Rosoff, G., Kaminker, R., & Nahmias, Y.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Nahmias, Yaakov
Venue
Nature Food
Published
2024-08-21
Volume
5
Issue
8
Pages
693-702
ISSN
2662-1355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401759340
Cited by
58
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 5
FWCI
7.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Food (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sam and Rina Frankel Foundation (donation; Y.N.) Believer Meats
  • Believer Meats
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
Keywords
cellular agriculture, continuous production, cross-flow filtration, perfusion culture, techno-economic analysis, production costs, scalability, cell density, multiple harvests
MeSH terms
Animals, Chickens, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Culture Media, Meat, Cell Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review