Cited by 2,034Fashion and Cultural TextilesCultural and Historical StudiesSoftware Engineering and Design Patterns

The environmental price of fast fashion

Open access
Niinimäki, Kirsi, Peters, Greg, Dahlbo, Helena, Perry, Patsy, Rissanen, Timo, Gwilt, Alison·2020·Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increased accessibility and consumption of fast fashion and mass-produced furniture engender plastics, petrochemicals, and waste that are damaging to the environment.

    “However, the amount of plastics, petrochemicals and waste that are engendered by the increased accessibility of these items and therefore their increased consumption are damaging to the environment [81].”

    From From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate (2025) · cites this paper as [81]

    The passages available from our copy are bibliographic metadata, not discussion of the paper’s findings. Searches for plastics, petrochemicals, waste, and furniture found no passage addressing the attributed claim, so it cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T., & Gwilt, A.
Affiliations
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • Finnish Environment Institute (FI)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • The New School (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Niinimäki, Kirsi
Venue
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
Published
2020-04-07
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
189-200
ISSN
2662-138X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016024765
Cited by
2,034
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 499 · 2025: 481 · 2024: 433 · 2023: 302 · 2022: 200 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 17
FWCI
59.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Earth & Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Fashion and Cultural Textiles
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cultural and Historical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Development › Software Engineering and Design Patterns
Keywords
fast fashion, clothing consumption, natural resource use, fashion industry, environmental policy, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review