Cited by 191Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Designing the next-generation clinical care pathway for Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Hampel, Harald, Au, Rhoda, Mattke, Soeren, van der Flier, Wiesje M., Aisen, Paul, Apostolova, Liana, Chen, Christopher, Cho, Min +10 more·2022·Nature Aging

Abstract

The reconceptualization of Alzheimer's disease (AD) as a clinical and biological construct has facilitated the development of biomarker-guided, pathway-based targeted therapies, many of which have reached late-stage development with the near-term potential to enter global clinical practice. These medical advances mark an unprecedented paradigm shift and requires an optimized global framework for clinical care pathways for AD. In this Perspective, we describe the blueprint for transitioning from the current, clinical symptom-focused and inherently late-stage diagnosis and management of AD to the next-generation pathway that incorporates biomarker-guided and digitally facilitated decision-making algorithms for risk stratification, early detection, timely diagnosis, and preventative or therapeutic interventions. We address critical and high-priority challenges, propose evidence-based strategic solutions, and emphasize that the perspectives of affected individuals and care partners need to be considered and integrated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43587-022-00269-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 139 · Cited by 191

Authors
Hampel, H., Au, R., Mattke, S., van der Flier, W. M., Aisen, P., Apostolova, L., Chen, C., Cho, M., De Santi, S., Gao, P., Iwata, A., Kurzman, R., Saykin, A. J., Teipel, S., Vellas, B., Vergallo, A., Wang, H., & Cummings, J.
Affiliations
  • Eisai (United States) (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital (JP)
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Hampel, Harald
Venue
Nature Aging
Published
2022-08-19
Volume
2
Issue
8
Pages
692-703
ISSN
2662-8465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293257971
Cited by
191
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 2
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (20SFRN35360180, 20SFRN35490098)
  • Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (U01 AG024904, 201902-2017835, P20GM109025)
  • Pfizer (P20GM109025, AG024904, U01 AG024904)
  • Biogen (P20GM109025, U01 AG024904, AG024904)
  • Health~Holland (#LSHM20106)
  • European Commission
  • ZonMw (#73305095007)
  • Eisai (U01 AG024904, AG024904, P20GM109025)
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ag024904-10, 1r56ag062109-01, U01-AG024904, AG024904)
  • Medical Research Council (U01 AG024904)
  • National Medical Research Council (MOH-000707–00, NMRC/OFLCG/2019, NMRC/CIRG/1485/2018)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG‐068753, U01-AG-024904, AG010133, P30AG010133, R44AG063635, AG063635, R01AG068193, AG068057, AG‐062109, U01AG057195, AG 024904, R56-AG062109, R01AG053798, P20AG068053, AG072654, AG019771, R01AG057739, AG072177, RF1AG062109, RF1AG072654, R35AG71476, R01AG019771, U19AG068753, P30AG072976, U01AG072177, T32AG071444, U24AG021886, R35AG071476, U01AG068057)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U01 AG024904, P20GM109025)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS093334)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM013463)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, care pathways, early detection, risk stratification, digital decision support, targeted therapy, disease prevention, care partners, patient perspectives, clinical practice transformation
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Biomarkers, Critical Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review