Cited by 6Vehicle Routing Optimization MethodsUrban and Freight Transport LogisticsUAV Applications and Optimization

Comparative modelling of drone interventions with traditional logistics modes for expedited and equitable deliveries

Open access
Oakey, Andy, Grote, Matt, Pilko, Aliaksei, Krol, Jakub, Blakesley, Alexander, Cherrett, Tom, Martinez-Sykora, Antonio, Anvari, Bani·2025·npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport

Abstract

Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs/drones) for deliveries have become a key consideration for logistics planners, particularly in the healthcare industry. Despite reported theoretical cost and speed benefits, few systems have realised long-term financially sustainable operations. This paper explores UAVs in a multi-mode logistics system (vans, UAVs, bicycles) using medical sample delivery case studies in the United Kingdom, and a computational model that accounts for routing, landing restrictions, costs, and payload constraint practicalities. Results identified potential transit time reductions of up to 90% using UAVs, though costs increased significantly (+133%). Achieving these time savings required UAV access to all sites and residents tolerating up to 40 flight movements per hour. Other time savings were possible with partial or no UAV uptake; however, all expedited solutions increased costs, raising the question of the value of such time savings, and whether any benefits would materialise, given onward supply chain limitations and changeable weather.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s44333-025-00050-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Oakey, A., Grote, M., Pilko, A., Krol, J., Blakesley, A., Cherrett, T., Martinez-Sykora, A., & Anvari, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Oakey, Andy
  • Grote, Matt
Venue
npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport
Published
2025-08-25
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
37-37
ISSN
3004-8664 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413487738
Cited by
6
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/V002619/1)
  • UK Department for Transport (Solent Future Transport Zone)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
Keywords
unmanned aerial vehicles, logistics routing, transit time reduction, shipping costs, bicycle delivery, payload constraints, healthcare logistics, computational modelling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review