The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ramsey Theory
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“too many features will likely lead to an over fi tted model which contains features, which are spurious (Graham et al . 1990; Calude & Longo 2017)”
From Human Judgment in algorithmic loops: Individual justice and automated decision‐making (2022) · cites this paper as Graham et al . 1990
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human Judgment in algorithmic loops: Individual justice and automated decision‐making
Binns, R. (2022) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12358 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, R. L., & Spencer, J. H.
- Venue
- Scientific American
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 263
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 112-117
- ISSN
- 0036-8733 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4244259932
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scientific American (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Advanced Topology and Set Theory
- Keywords
- Ramsey theory, combinatorics, order and chaos
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review