The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lack of communication between healthcare professionals and women with ovarian cancer about sexual issues
Open accessAbstract
Gynaecological cancer has been shown to affect women's sexual functioning, yet evidence suggests that healthcare professionals rarely discuss sexual issues with women diagnosed with a gynaecological cancer. Few studies have investigated why there is a lack of communication between healthcare professionals and women about sexual issues. Our study investigated the attitudes and behaviours of the 27 doctors and 16 nurses treating women with ovarian cancer in our centre towards the discussion of sexual issues, and also investigated women's experiences of such communication. Our findings showed that although most healthcare professionals thought that the majority of women with ovarian cancer would experience a sexual problem, only a quarter of doctors and a fifth of nurses actually discussed sexual issues with the women. Reasons for not discussing sexual issues included 'it is not my responsibility', 'embarrassment', 'lack of knowledge and experience' and 'lack of resources to provide support if needed'. While some of these reasons were also viewed as barriers by the women, the results demonstrate that there is a need from the women's perspective to improve communication about sexual issues, although the most appropriate approach to this remains to be investigated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review
Hack, T. F., Degner, L. F., & Parker, P. A. (2005) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.949 · Cited by 398
Carter, J., Lacchetti, C., Andersen, B. L., Barton, D. L., Bolte, S., Damast, S., Diefenbach, M. A., DuHamel, K., Florendo, J., Ganz, P. A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.75.8995 · Cited by 359
A systematic review of sexual concerns reported by gynecological cancer survivors
Abbott-Anderson, K., & Kwekkeboom, K. L. (2012) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.030 · Cited by 263
Hummel, S. B., van Lankveld, J. J., Oldenburg, H. S., Hahn, D. E., Broomans, E., & Aaronson, N. K. (2015) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1320-z · Cited by 64
Tung, T.-H., Chen, H.-W., Chou, H.-H., Tsai, J.-L., Yang, Y.-C., & Lee, J. T. (2023) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-023-07141-2 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Stead, M. L., Brown, J. M., Fallowfield, L., & Selby, P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 666-671
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2093082116
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lack of communication between healthcare professionals and women with ovarian cancer about sexual issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600799
- The paper
- Stead, M. L., Brown, J. M., Fallowfield, L., & Selby, P. (2003). Lack of communication between healthcare professionals and women with ovarian cancer about sexual issues. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.