The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for lung cancers?
Open accessAbstract
To examine whether weight loss at presentation influences outcome in patients who received chemotherapy for lung cancer or mesothelioma. Multivariate analysis of prospectively collected data 1994-2001. Data were available for age, gender, performance status, histology, stage, response, toxicity, progression-free and overall survival. The outcomes of patients with or without weight loss treated with chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC; n=290), stages III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n=418), or mesothelioma (n=72) were compared. Weight loss was reported by 59, 58 and 76% of patients with SCLC, NSCLC and mesothelioma, respectively. Patients with weight loss and NSCLC (P=0.003) or mesothelioma (P=0.05) more frequently failed to complete at least three cycles of chemotherapy. Anaemia as a toxicity occurred significantly more frequently in NSCLC patients with weight loss (P=0.0003). The incidence of other toxicities was not significantly affected by weight loss. NSCLC patients with weight loss had fewer symptomatic responses (P=0.001). Mesothelioma patients with weight loss had fewer symptomatic (P=0.03) and objective responses (P=0.05). Weight loss was an independent predictor of shorter overall survival for patients with SCLC (P=0.003, relative risk (RR)=1.5), NSCLC (P=0.009, RR=1.33) and mesothelioma (P=0.03, RR=1.92) and an independent predictor of progression-free survival in patients with SCLC (P=0.01, RR=1.43). In conclusion, weight loss as a symptom of lung cancer predicts for toxicity from treatment and shorter survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cited by
ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients
Arends, J., Bachmann, P., Baracos, V., Barthelemy, N., Bertz, H., Bozzetti, F., Fearon, K., Hütterer, E., Isenring, E., Kaasa, S., et al. (2017) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015 · Cited by 3,114
ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical Nutrition in cancer
Muscaritoli, M., Arends, J., Bachmann, P., Baracos, V., Barthelemy, N., Bertz, H., Bozzetti, F., Hütterer, E., Isenring, E., Kaasa, S., et al. (2021) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.005 · Cited by 1,702
Pressoir, M., Desné, S., Berchery, D., Rossignol, G., Poiree, B., Meslier, M., Traversier, S., Vittot, M., Simon, M., Gekiere, J. P., et al. (2010) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605578 · Cited by 668
Temel, J. S., Abernethy, A. P., Currow, D. C., Friend, J., Duus, E. M., Yan, Y., & Fearon, K. C. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00558-6 · Cited by 639
Garcia, J. M., Boccia, R. V., Graham, C. D., Yan, Y., Duus, E. M., Allen, S., & Friend, J. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71154-4 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross, P. J., Ashley, S., Norton, A., Priest, K., Waters, J. S., Eisen, T., Smith, I. E., & O'Brien, M. E. R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2004-04-20
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1905-1911
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2046387692
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for lung cancers? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601781
- The paper
- Ross, P. J., Ashley, S., Norton, A., Priest, K., Waters, J. S., Eisen, T., Smith, I. E., & O'Brien, M. E. R. (2004). Do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for lung cancers? British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601781
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.