Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Expression and co-expression of the members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family in invasive breast carcinoma

Open access
Abd El-Rehim, D M, Pinder, S E, Paish, C E, Bell, J A, Rampaul, R S, Blamey, R W, Robertson, J F R, Nicholson, R I, Ellis, I O·2004·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family plays an important role in breast carcinogenesis. Much interest has been focused recently on its members because of their potential role as prognostic indicators in breast cancer and their involvement in cancer therapy. We have evaluated more than 1500 cases of invasive breast carcinoma immunohistochemically using tissue microarray technology to examine the expression of EGFR family receptor proteins. We have found that 20.1 and 31.8% of cases were positive for EGFR and c-erbB-2, respectively, and 45 and 45.1% of tumours overexpressed for c-erbB-3 and c-erbB-4, respectively. The expression of either EGFR or c-erbB-2 was associated with other bad prognostic features and with poor outcome. Neither c-erbB-3 nor c-erbB-4 had any association with survival. c-erbB-2 had an independent prognostic effect on overall and disease-free survival (DFS) in all cases, as well as in the subset of breast carcinoma patients with nodal metastases. Several hetero- and homodimeric combinations have been reported between the EGFR members. Those dimers can evoke diverse signal transduction pathways with variable cellular responses. We stratified cases according to their co-expression of receptors into distinct groups with different receptor-positive combinations. Patients whose tumours co-expressed c-erbB-2 and c-erbB-3, as well as those whose tumours co-expressed EGFR, c-erbB-2 and c-erbB-4 showed an unfavourable outcome compared with other groups, while combined c-erbB-3 and c-erbB-4 expression was associated with a better outcome. In cases showing expression of one family member only (homodimers), we found a significant association between c-erbB-4 homodimer-expressing tumours and better DFS. In contrast, patients with c-erbB-2 homodimer-expressing tumours had a significant poorer DFS compared with other cases. These data imply that the combined profile expression patterns of the four receptor family members together provide more accurate information on the tumour behaviour than studying the expression of each receptor individually.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602184

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Abd El-Rehim, D. M., Pinder, S. E., Paish, C. E., Bell, J. A., Rampaul, R. S., Blamey, R. W., Robertson, J. F. R., Nicholson, R. I., & Ellis, I. O.
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2004-10
Volume
91
Issue
8
Pages
1532-1542
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W1992916424
Cited by
256
References
0
FWCI
10.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expression and co-expression of the members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family in invasive breast carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602184
The paper
Abd El-Rehim, D. M., Pinder, S. E., Paish, C. E., Bell, J. A., Rampaul, R. S., Blamey, R. W., Robertson, J. F. R., Nicholson, R. I., & Ellis, I. O. (2004). Expression and co-expression of the members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family in invasive breast carcinoma. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602184

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.