The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Slug expression is an independent prognostic parameter for poor survival in colorectal carcinoma patients
Open accessAbstract
Slug, a member of the Snail family of transcription factors, plays a crucial role in the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by suppressing several epithelial markers and adhesion molecules including E-cadherin. Recently, several studies have reported Slug to be expressed in breast carcinoma, oesophageal carcinoma accompanied with shorter survival. In this study, we first investigated expression of Slug mRNA in five colorectal carcinoma cell lines by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Furthermore, we investigated Slug and E-cadherin expression by immunohistochemistry in 138 patients with colorectal carcinoma. Slug mRNA was clearly expressed in four out of five colorectal carcinoma cell lines. Positive expression of Slug and E-cadherin was observed in 37 and 58% of cases, respectively. The positive expression of Slug was significantly associated with Dukes stage and distant metastasis (P = 0.0027 and 0.0007), and the positive expression of Slug had a significant impact on patient overall survival (P < 0.0001, log-rank test). Moreover, patients with positive expression of Slug and reduced expression of E-cadherin showed the worst prognosis (P < 0.0001, log-rank test). Multivariate analysis indicated that Slug expression was an independent prognostic factor. These results suggest that positive Slug expression in colorectal carcinoma patients may become a significant parameter of poor prognosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer
Dongre, A., & Weinberg, R. A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0080-4 · Cited by 3,876
Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: An alliance against the epithelial phenotype?
Peinado, H., Olmeda, D., & Cano, A. (2007) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2131 · Cited by 3,121
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer development and its clinical significance
Iwatsuki, M., Mimori, K., Yokobori, T., Ishi, H., Beppu, T., Nakamori, S., Baba, H., & Mori, M. (2010) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01419.x · Cited by 780
De Sousa E Melo, F., Wang, X., Jansen, M., Fessler, E., Trinh, A., de Rooij, L. P. M. H., de Jong, J. H., de Boer, O. J., van Leersum, R., Bijlsma, M. F., et al. (2013) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3174 · Cited by 771
p53 controls cancer cell invasion by inducing the MDM2-mediated degradation of Slug
Wang, S.-P., Wang, W.-L., Chang, Y.-L., Wu, C.-T., Chao, Y.-C., Kao, S.-H., Yuan, A., Lin, C.-W., Yang, S.-C., Chan, W.-K., et al. (2009) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1875 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- Shioiri, M., Shida, T., Koda, K., Oda, K., Seike, K., Nishimura, M., Takano, S., & Miyazaki, M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1816-1822
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W1979909585
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Slug expression is an independent prognostic parameter for poor survival in colorectal carcinoma patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603193
- The paper
- Shioiri, M., Shida, T., Koda, K., Oda, K., Seike, K., Nishimura, M., Takano, S., & Miyazaki, M. (2006). Slug expression is an independent prognostic parameter for poor survival in colorectal carcinoma patients. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.