Cited by 234HER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

A phase I dose escalation study of BIBW 2992, an irreversible dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR) and 2 (HER2) tyrosine kinase in a 2-week on, 2-week off schedule in patients with advanced solid tumours

Open access
Eskens, F A L M, Mom, C H, Planting, A S T, Gietema, J A, Amelsberg, A, Huisman, H, van Doorn, L, Burger, H +3 more·2008·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

To assess tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and clinical activity of the dual epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) 1 and 2 (HER2) tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBW 2992. An escalating schedule of once-daily (OD) BIBW 2992 for 14 days followed by 14 days off medication was explored. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled. Dose levels were 10, 20, 30, 45, 70, 85, and 100 mg. At 100 mg dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (common toxicity criteria grade 3 skin rash and grade 3 diarrhoea despite treatment with loperamide) occurred in two patients. In the next-lower dose of 70 mg, DLT (grade 3 fatigue and ALAT elevation) occurred in one of six patients. An intermediate dose level of 85 mg was studied. Here DLT occurred in two patients (grade 3 diarrhoea despite treatment and grade 2 diarrhoea lasting more than 7 days despite treatment). An additional 12 patients were treated at 70 mg. BIBW 2992 PK after single and multiple doses revealed moderately fast absorption, and no deviation from dose proportionality. Pharmacodynamics analysis in skin biopsies did not show significant changes in EGFR-associated biomarkers. However, a significant inhibitory effect on the proliferation index of epidermal keratinocytes was observed. No partial or complete responses were observed, stable disease lasting more than four cycles was seen in seven patients. The recommended dose for studies with BIBW 2992 for 14 days followed by 14 days off medication is 70 mg OD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604108

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As monotherapy, afatinib and dacomitinib fail to overcome T790M-mediated resistance in patients because effective preclinical concentrations cannot be reached due to wild-type EGFR toxicity.

    “However, as monotherapy, they have failed to overcome T790M-mediated resistance in patients (28, 29), because concentrations at which these irreversible TKIs overcome T790M activity pre-clinically are not achievable in humans due to dose-limiting toxicity related to non-selective inhibition of wild-type EGFR (30).”
  • Afatinib is reported to be ineffective against lung cancer harboring EGFR T790M positive mutations because concentrations needed are not achievable in humans due to dose limiting toxicities, indicating a narrow therapeutic window.

    “Afatinib is reported to be ineffective against lung cancer harboring EGFR T790M positive mutations, because concentrations at which afatinib inhibits lung cancer cells harboring EGFR T790M are not achievable in humans due to dose limiting toxicities such as skin rash and diarrhea, indicating a narrow therapeutic window of afatinib for EGFR T790M [40].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan R, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom A, Christian M, Gwyther S (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 205–216 10655437

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eskens, F. A. L. M., Mom, C. H., Planting, A. S. T., Gietema, J. A., Amelsberg, A., Huisman, H., van Doorn, L., Burger, H., Stopfer, P., Verweij, J., & de Vries, E. G. E.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) (US)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Netherlands) (NL)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Eskens, F A L M
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2007-11-20
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
80-85
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2153156618
Cited by
234
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 21
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
afatinib, eribulin, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, dose escalation, advanced solid tumors, dose-limiting toxicity, rash, diarrhea, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, keratinocyte proliferation, recommended dose, tolerability
MeSH terms
Afatinib, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quinazolines, Skin, Time Factors, Tissue Distribution, Keratinocytes, Treatment Outcome, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Maximum Tolerated Dose, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review