Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 515

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deficient mismatch repair system in patients with sporadic advanced colorectal cancer

Open access
Koopman, M, Kortman, G A M, Mekenkamp, L, Ligtenberg, M J L, Hoogerbrugge, N, Antonini, N F, Punt, C J A, van Krieken, J H J M·2009·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

A deficient mismatch repair system (dMMR) is present in 10-20% of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with a favourable prognosis in early stage disease. Data on patients with advanced disease are scarce. Our aim was to investigate the incidence and outcome of sporadic dMMR in advanced CRC. Data were collected from a phase III study in 820 advanced CRC patients. Expression of mismatch repair proteins was examined by immunohistochemistry. In addition microsatellite instability analysis was performed and the methylation status of the MLH1 promoter was assessed. We then correlated MMR status to clinical outcome. Deficient mismatch repair was found in only 18 (3.5%) out of 515 evaluable patients, of which 13 were caused by hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter. The median overall survival in proficient MMR (pMMR), dMMR caused by hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter and total dMMR was 17.9 months (95% confidence interval 16.2-18.8), 7.4 months (95% CI 3.7-16.9) and 10.2 months (95% CI 5.9-19.8), respectively. The disease control rate in pMMR and dMMR patients was 83% (95% CI 79-86%) and 56% (30-80%), respectively. We conclude that dMMR is rare in patients with sporadic advanced CRC. This supports the hypothesis that dMMR tumours have a reduced metastatic potential, as is observed in dMMR patients with early stage disease. The low incidence of dMMR does not allow drawing meaningful conclusions about the outcome of treatment in these patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604867

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 515

Metadata

Authors
Koopman, M., Kortman, G. A. M., Mekenkamp, L., Ligtenberg, M. J. L., Hoogerbrugge, N., Antonini, N. F., Punt, C. J. A., & van Krieken, J. H. J. M.
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2009-01
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
266-273
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2052228812
Cited by
515
References
3
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deficient mismatch repair system in patients with sporadic advanced colorectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604867
The paper
Koopman, M., Kortman, G. A. M., Mekenkamp, L., Ligtenberg, M. J. L., Hoogerbrugge, N., Antonini, N. F., Punt, C. J. A., & van Krieken, J. H. J. M. (2009). Deficient mismatch repair system in patients with sporadic advanced colorectal cancer. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604867

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.