Cited by 83Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

PTEN status in advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab

Open access
Negri, F V, Bozzetti, C, Lagrasta, C A, Crafa, P, Bonasoni, M P, Camisa, R, Pedrazzi, G, Ardizzoni, A·2010·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loss of phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted in chromosome 10 (PTEN) function in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) may represent one of the resistance mechanisms to cetuximab by interfering with the epidermal growth factor receptor signal transduction pathway. METHODS: PTEN expression tested by indirect immunofluorescence was evaluated both on primary (n=43) and on metastatic (n=24) sites in CRC patients treated with cetuximab. RESULTS: The loss of PTEN expression tested on metastatic sites was negatively associated with response (100% progressive disease (PD) in PTEN-negative cases vs 30% PD in PTEN-positive cases; P<0.05), PFS (0.8 vs 8.2 months; P<0.001) and OS (2.9 vs 14.2 months; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: A potential role of PTEN in the anti-tumour activity of cetuximab could be hypothesised.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605471

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 83

Authors
Negri, F. V., Bozzetti, C., Lagrasta, C. A., Crafa, P., Bonasoni, M. P., Camisa, R., Pedrazzi, G., & Ardizzoni, A.
Affiliations
  • Ospedale di Parma (IT)
  • Santa Maria Nuova Hospital (IT)
  • University of Parma (IT)
Corresponding author
Negri, F V
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2009-12-01
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
162-164
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2002019030
Cited by
83
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
PTEN, advanced colorectal cancer, cetuximab, anti-EGFR therapy, drug resistance, metastatic colorectal cancer, PTEN expression, progression-free survival, overall survival, epidermal growth factor receptor signaling
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin, Adenocarcinoma, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Camptothecin, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Neoplasm Proteins, Organoplatinum Compounds, Colorectal Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Salvage Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Gene Deletion, Gene Dosage, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Gene Expression Profiling, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, PTEN Phosphohydrolase, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review