The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers from exhaled breath using a single array of nanosensors
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Tumour growth is accompanied by gene and/or protein changes that may lead to peroxidation of the cell membrane species and, hence, to the emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In this study, we investigated the ability of a nanosensor array to discriminate between breath VOCs that characterise healthy states and the most widespread cancer states in the developed world: lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers. METHODS: Exhaled alveolar breath was collected from 177 volunteers aged 20-75 years (patients with lung, colon, breast, and prostate cancers and healthy controls). Breath from cancerous subjects was collected before any treatment. The healthy population was healthy according to subjective patient's data. The breath of volunteers was examined by a tailor-made array of cross-reactive nanosensors based on organically functionalised gold nanoparticles and gas chromatography linked to the mass spectrometry technique (GC-MS). RESULTS: The results showed that the nanosensor array could differentiate between 'healthy' and 'cancerous' breath, and, furthermore, between the breath of patients having different cancer types. Moreover, the nanosensor array could distinguish between the breath patterns of different cancers in the same statistical analysis, irrespective of age, gender, lifestyle, and other confounding factors. The GC-MS results showed that each cancer could have a unique pattern of VOCs, when compared with healthy states, but not when compared with other cancer types. CONCLUSIONS: The reported results could lead to the development of an inexpensive, easy-to-use, portable, non-invasive tool that overcomes many of the deficiencies associated with the currently available diagnostic methods for cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Volatile Organic Compounds of Lung Cancer and Possible Biochemical Pathways
Hakim, M., Broza, Y. Y., Barash, O., Peled, N., Phillips, M., Amann, A., & Haick, H. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300174a · Cited by 953
Self-citationSensors for Breath Testing: From Nanomaterials to Comprehensive Disease Detection
Konvalina, G., & Haick, H. (2014) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar400070m · Cited by 561
Self-citationIntegrating Artificial Intelligence and Nanotechnology for Precision Cancer Medicine
Adir, O., Poley, M., Chen, G., Froim, S., Krinsky, N., Shklover, J., Shainsky‐Roitman, J., Lammers, T., & Schroeder, A. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901989 · Cited by 496
Review—Non-Invasive Monitoring of Human Health by Exhaled Breath Analysis: A Comprehensive Review
Das, S., & Pal, M. (2020) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ab67a6 · Cited by 466
Evolution of breath analysis based on humidity and gas sensors: Potential and challenges
Tai, H., Wang, S., Duan, Z., & Jiang, Y. (2020) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2020.128104 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, G., Hakim, M., Broza, Y. Y., Billan, S., Abdah-Bortnyak, R., Kuten, A., Tisch, U., & Haick, H.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2010-07-20
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 542-551
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2144379247
- Cited by
- 775
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers from exhaled breath using a single array of nanosensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605810
- The paper
- Peng, G., Hakim, M., Broza, Y. Y., Billan, S., Abdah-Bortnyak, R., Kuten, A., Tisch, U., & Haick, H. (2010). Detection of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers from exhaled breath using a single array of nanosensors. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605810
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.