The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Complete in vivo reversal of P‐glycoprotein pump function in the blood‐brain barrier visualized with positron emission tomography
Open accessAbstract
1. Homozygously mdr1a gene disrupted mice (mdr1a(-/-) mice) and wild type mice (mdr1a(+/+) mice) were used to develop a method for P-glycoprotein (P-gp) function imaging non-invasively and to study the effect of a P-gp reversal agent on its function in vivo. 2. [11C]verapamil (0.1 mg/kg) was administered and the changes in tissue concentrations were determined ex vivo by organ extirpation and in vivo with PET. To block P-gp function, cyclosporin A was administered. 3. Biodistribution studies revealed 9.5-fold (P < 0.001) and 3.4-fold (P < 0.001) higher [11C]verapamil in the brain and testes of mdr1a(-/-) mice than in mdr1a(+/+) mice. Cyclosporin A (25 mg/kg) increased [11C]verapamil levels in the brain and testes of mdr1a(+/+) mice in both cases 3.3-fold (P < 0.01 (brain); P < 0.001 (testes)). Fifty mg/kg cyclosporin A increased [11C]verapamil in the brain 10.6-fold (P < 0.01) and in the testes 4.1-fold (P < 0.001). No increases were found in the mdr1a(-/-) mice. This indicates complete inhibition of P-gp mediated [11C]verapamil efflux. 4. Positron camera data showed lower [11C]verapamil levels in the brain of mdr1a(+/+) mice compared to those in mdr1a(-/-) mice. [11C]verapamil accumulation in the brain of mdr1a(+/+) mice was increased by cyclosporin A to levels comparable with those in mdr1a(-/-) mice, indicating that reversal of P-gp mediated efflux can be monitored by PET. 5. We conclude that cyclosporin A can fully block the P-gp function in the blood brain barrier and the testes and that PET enables the in vivo measurement of P-gp function and reversal of its function non-invasively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blood–brain barrier dysfunction in parkinsonian midbrain in vivo
Kortekaas, R., Leenders, K. L., van Oostrom, J. C. H., Vaalburg, W., Bart, J., Willemsen, A. T. M., & Hendrikse, N. H. (2005) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20369 · Cited by 733
Self-citationImpact of Drug Transporter Studies on Drug Discovery and Development
Mizuno, N., Niwa, T., Yotsumoto, Y., & Sugiyama, Y. (2003) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.55.3.1 · Cited by 490
A Self-Destructive Nanosweeper That Captures and Clears Amyloid β-Peptides
Luo, Q., Lin, Y.-X., Yang, P.-P., Wang, Y., Qi, G.-B., Qiao, Z.-Y., Li, B.-N., Zhang, K., Zhang, J.-P., Wang, L., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04255-z · Cited by 191
Stem Cell-Based Human Blood–Brain Barrier Models for Drug Discovery and Delivery
Aday, S., Cecchelli, R., Hallier-Vanuxeem, D., Dehouck, M. P., & Ferreira, L. (2016) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.01.001 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendrikse, N. H., Schinkel, A. H., De Vries, E. G. E., Fluks, E., Van der Graaf, W. T. A., Willemsen, A. T. M., Vaalburg, W., & Franssen, E. J. F.
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1413-1418
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- OpenAlex
- W2083673453
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complete in vivo reversal of P‐glycoprotein pump function in the blood‐brain barrier visualized with positron emission tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjp.0701979
- The paper
- Hendrikse, N. H., Schinkel, A. H., De Vries, E. G. E., Fluks, E., Van der Graaf, W. T. A., Willemsen, A. T. M., Vaalburg, W., & Franssen, E. J. F. (1998). Complete in vivo reversal of P‐glycoprotein pump function in the blood‐brain barrier visualized with positron emission tomography. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0701979
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.