Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 603

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pharmacological characterization of a novel cell line expressing human α4β3δ GABAA receptors

Open access
Brown, N, Kerby, J, Bonnert, T P, Whiting, P J, Wafford, K A·2002·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

The pharmacology of the stable cell line expressing human α 4 β 3 δ GABA A receptor was investigated using whole‐cell patch‐clamp techniques. α 4 β 3 δ receptors exhibited increased sensitivity to GABA when compared to α 4 β 3 γ 2 receptors, with EC 50's of 0.50 (0.46, 0.53) μ M and 2.6 (2.5, 2.6) μ M respectively. Additionally, the GABA partial agonists piperidine‐4‐sulphonate (P4S) and 4,5,6,7‐tetrahydroisothiazolo‐[5,4‐c]pyridin‐3‐ol (THIP) displayed markedly higher efficacy at α 4 β 3 δ receptors, indeed THIP demonstrated greater efficacy than GABA at these receptors. The δ subunit conferred slow desensitization to GABA, with rate constants of 4.8±0.5 s for α 4 β 3 δ and 2.5±0.2 s for α 4 β 3 γ 2. However, both P4S and THIP demonstrated similar levels of desensitization on both receptor subtypes suggesting this effect is agonist specific. α 4 β 3 δ and α 4 β 3 γ 2 demonstrated equal sensitivity to inhibition by the cation zinc (2–3 μ M IC 50). However, α 4 β 3 δ receptors demonstrated greater sensitivity to inhibition by lanthanum. The IC 50 for GABA antagonists SR‐95531 and picrotoxin, was similar for α 4 β 3 δ and α 4 β 3 γ 2. Likewise, inhibition was observed on both subtypes at high and low pH. α 4 β 3 δ receptors were insensitive to modulation by benzodiazepine ligands. In contrast Ro15‐4513 and bretazenil potentiated GABA responses on α 4 β 3 γ 2 cells, and the inverse agonist DMCM showed allosteric inhibition of α 4 β 3 γ 2 receptors. The efficacy of neurosteroids at α 4 β 3 δ receptors was greatly enhanced over that observed at α 4 β 3 γ 2 receptors. The greatest effect was observed using THDOC with 524±71.6% potentiation at α 4 β 3 δ and 297.9±49.7% at α 4 β 3 γ 2 receptors. Inhibition by the steroid pregnenolone sulphate however, showed no subtype selectivity. The efficacy of both pentobarbitone and propofol was slightly augmented and etomidate greatly enhanced at α 4 β 3 δ receptors versus α 4 β 3 γ 2 receptors. We show that the α 4 β 3 δ receptor has a distinct pharmacology and kinetic profile. With its restricted distribution within the brain and unique pharmacology this receptor may play an important role in the action of neurosteroids and anaesthetics. British Journal of Pharmacology (2002) 136, 965–974. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704795

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704795

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 603

Metadata

Authors
Brown, N., Kerby, J., Bonnert, T. P., Whiting, P. J., & Wafford, K. A.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08
Volume
136
Issue
7
Pages
965-974
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2061947653
Cited by
603
References
1
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacological characterization of a novel cell line expressing human α4β3δ GABAA receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjp.0704795
The paper
Brown, N., Kerby, J., Bonnert, T. P., Whiting, P. J., & Wafford, K. A. (2002). Pharmacological characterization of a novel cell line expressing human α4β3δ GABAA receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0704795

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.